RECENT BLOG NEWS
wolfSSL support for STSAFE-A100 crypto coprocessor
wolfSSL supports the STMicroelectronics STSAFE-A100 I2C cryptographic coprocessor. It's capable of ECC sign/verify (ECDSA) and shared secret (ECDH) operations for 256-bit and 384-bit (NIST Prime and Brainpool) curves. It has 2 key slots and 6KB of non-volatile memory for certificate or data storage.
Prerequisites:
- Requires the STSAFE-A Device Library from ST
- Requires wolfSSL interface and crypto configuration code (available by request and approval from ST)
Examples:
- wolfSSL uses PK callbacks for the TLS crypto operations
- wolfCrypt uses the WOLFSSL_STSAFEA100 macro to enable native `wc_ecc_*` API support
The README.md and reference PK callbacks can be found here: https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/tree/master/wolfcrypt/src/port/st
Preprocessor Macros:
- WOLFSSL_STSAFEA100
PK Callbacks:
wolfSSL TLS layer PK callbacks expose API’s to set ECC callbacks.Enabled with: #define HAVE_PK_CALLBACKS
or ./configure --enable-pkcallbacks
.
Reference API’s:
- SSL_STSAFE_CreateKeyCb
- SSL_STSAFE_SignCertificateCb
- SSL_STSAFE_VerifyPeerCertCb
- SSL_STSAFE_SharedSecretCb
Reference API for loading device certificate:
- SSL_STSAFE_LoadDeviceCertificate
For more questions please email us at facts@wolfssl.com.
wolfSSL support for the ATECC508A/ATECC608A crypto coprocessor
wolfSSL embedded SSL/TLS support the latest Microchip ATECC508A and ATECC608A I2C cryptographic coprocessors. The latest round of fixes to support the most recent CryptoAuthLib are in a pull request here (https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/1815). We have not yet tested with the ATECC608A due to lack of hardware, but wolfSSL is compatible with the latest CryptoAuthLib. We plan on adding support for the new 608A PRF and HKDF for TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 speed improvements.
Prerequisites:
- Requires the Microchip CryptoAuthLib (https://github.com/MicrochipTech/cryptoauthlib.git)
Examples:
- wolfSSL uses PK (Public Key) callbacks for the TLS crypto operations
- wolfCrypt uses the WOLFSSL_ATECC508A macro to enable native `wc_ecc_*` API support
The README.md and reference PK callbacks can be found here: https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/tree/master/wolfcrypt/src/port/atmel
Additional demos for wolfSSL TLS Client/Server and wolfCrypt test/benchmarks can be found:
https://www.wolfssl.com/download/downloadMoreForm.php
https://github.com/dgarske/atmel
Preprocessor Macros:
- WOLFSSL_ATECC508A
- WOLFSSL_ATECC_PKCB
- WOLFSSL_ATMEL
PK Callbacks:
wolfSSL’s TLS layer PK callbacks expose API’s to set ECC callbacks. These are enabled with: #define HAVE_PK_CALLBACKS
or ./configure --enable-pkcallbacks
.
Reference API’s:
- atcatls_create_key_cb
- atcatls_verify_signature_cb
- atcatls_sign_certificate_cb
- atcatls_create_pms_cb
For more questions please email us at facts@wolfssl.com.
Differences between SSL and TLS Protocol Versions (#TLS13)
SSL 3.0
This protocol was released in 1996, but first began with the creation of SSL 1.0 developed by Netscape. Version 1.0 wasn`t released, and version 2.0 had a number of security flaws, thus leading to the release of SSL 3.0. Some major improvements of SSL 3.0 over SSL 2.0 are:
– Separation of the transport of data from the message layer
– Use of a full 128 bits of keying material even when using the Export cipher
– Ability of the client and server to send chains of certificates, thus allowing organizations to use certificate hierarchy which is more than two certificates deep.
– Implementing a generalized key exchange protocol, allowing Diffie-Hellman and Fortezza key exchanges as well as non-RSA certificates.
– Allowing for record compression and decompression
– Ability to fall back to SSL 2.0 when a 2.0 client is encountered
Netscape`s Original SSL 3.0 Draft: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/ssl/draft302.txt
Comparison of SSLv2 and SSLv3: http://stason.org/TULARC/security/ssl-talk/4-11-What-is-the-difference-between-SSL-2-0-and-3-0.html
TLS 1.0
This protocol was first defined in RFC 2246 in January of 1999. This was an upgrade from SSL 3.0 and the differences were not dramatic, but they are significant enough that SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0 don`t interoperate. Some of the major differences between SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0 are:
– Key derivation functions are different
– MACs are different – SSL 3.0 uses a modification of an early HMAC while TLS 1.0 uses HMAC.
– The Finished messages are different
– TLS has more alerts
– TLS requires DSS/DH support
RFC 2246: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2246
TLS 1.1
This protocol was defined in RFC 4346 in April of 2006, and is an update to TLS 1.0. The major changes are:
– The Implicit Initialization Vector (IV) is replaced with an explicit IV to protect against Cipher block chaining (CBC) attacks.
– Handling of padded errors is changed to use the bad_record_mac alert rather than the decryption_failed alert to protect against CBC attacks.
– IANA registries are defined for protocol parameters
– Premature closes no longer cause a session to be non-resumable.
RFC 4346: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4346#section-1.1
TLS 1.2
This protocol was defined in RFC 5246 in August of 2008. Based on TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2 contains improved flexibility. The major differences include:
– The MD5/SHA-1 combination in the pseudorandom function (PRF) was replaced with cipher-suite-specified PRFs.
– The MD5/SHA-1 combination in the digitally-signed element was replaced with a single hash. Signed elements include a field explicitly specifying the hash algorithm used.
– There was substantial cleanup to the client`s and server`s ability to specify which hash and signature algorithms they will accept.
– Addition of support for authenticated encryption with additional data modes.
– TLS Extensions definition and AES Cipher Suites were merged in.
– Tighter checking of EncryptedPreMasterSecret version numbers.
– Many of the requirements were tightened
– Verify_data length depends on the cipher suite
– Description of Bleichenbacher/Dlima attack defenses cleaned up.
RFC 5246: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246
TLS 1.3
This protocol is currently being revised, and is in its 28th draft. The major differences from TLS 1.2 include:
– The list of supported symmetric algorithms has been pruned of all legacy algorithms. The remaining algorithms all use Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data (AEAD) algorithms.
– A zero-RTT (0-RTT) mode was added, saving a round-trip at connection setup for some application data at the cost of certain security properties.
– Static RSA and Diffie-Hellman cipher suites have been removed; all public-key based key exchange mechanisms now provide forward secrecy.
– All handshake messages after the ServerHello are now encrypted.
– Key derivation functions have been re-designed, with the HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand Key Derivation Function (HKDF) being used as a primitive.
– The handshake state machine has been restructured to be more consistent and remove superfluous messages.
– ECC is now in the base spec and includes new signature algorithms. Point format negotiation has been removed in favor of single point format for each curve.
– Compression, custom DHE groups, and DSA have been removed, RSA padding now uses PSS.
– TLS 1.2 version negotiation verification mechanism was deprecated in favor of a version list in an extension.
– Session resumption with and without server-side state and the PSK-based ciphersuites of earlier versions of TLS have been replaced by a single new PSK exchange.
RFC 8446: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8446
Resources:
If you would like to read more about SSL or TLS, here are several resources that might be helpful:
TLS – Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security)
SSL versus TLS – What`s the Difference? (http://luxsci.com/blog/ssl-versus-tls-whats-the-difference.html)
Cisco – SSL: Foundation for Web Security (http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_1-1/ssl.html)
As always, if you have any questions or would like to talk to the wolfSSL team about more information, please contact facts@wolfssl.com.
wolfSSL Support for Apache Mynewt
Apache Mynewt is a operating system which is Open Source, modular and realtime (RTOS). It is designed for IoT devices that have limited memory and storage and need to run for a long time with minimal power consumption. More details of Apache Mynewt can be found on the project’s website: http://mynewt.apache.org/
wolfSSL is happy to announce support for Apache Mynewt! We have added a new preprocessor define to enable the mynewt port layer in wolfSSL, called WOLFSSL_APACHE_MYNEWT. This port uses Mynewt’s raw socket interface, “mnsocket”, to send and receive data over the SSL/TLS connection.
In order to use wolfSSL in your mynewt project, You need to deploy wolfSSL source code to the project. Please see the README.md document included with wolfSSL for information about deployment and build methods. Our Mynewt port and project documentation is located in the “IDE/mynewt” directory of the wolfSSL package:
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/tree/master/IDE/mynewt
We also created an example wolfSSL client for Mynewt. To use the wolfSSL client sample in your mynewt project, you first need to first deploy the “wolfssl-example” source code to the project. Please see the README.md document in our “wolfssl-examples” repository on GitHub for information about build, test, and deployment methods.
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl-examples/tree/master/mynewt
Please contact us at facts@wolfssl.com if you would like more information about our Apache Mynewt support or about the wolfSSL SSL/TLS library in general. wolfSSL also now supports TLS 1.3 and FIPS 140-2, both of which could now be used in conjunction with Apache Mynewt!
wolfSSL Xilinx Support
wolfSSL now supports Xilinx SoCs and FPGAs. The wolfSSL embedded SSL/TLS library can be used with FPGAs which use the MicroBlaze CPU and/or Zynq and Zynq UltraScale+ SoCs. Improved performance speeds with using the hardware crpyto can be seen. Increasing AES-GCM, RSA, and SHA3 operations performance. In addition to the performance gained a user also gets the additional security the hardware provides while executing the algorithms.
For more information contact facts@wolfssl.com
How to speed up handshake times when using ECDHE (and/or ECDSA)
We have had some reports of low-end embedded systems taking 10-20 seconds to establish a TLS connection when generating a shared secret using the ECDH algorithm.
We wanted to remind our users of the fixed-point caching mechanism provided by wolfSSL. Users can enable fixed point caching with the configure option --enable-fpecc or by defining FP_ECC in their settings. Users will also need to configure which look up table (FP_LUT) to use and the number of entries (FP_ENTRIES).
FP_LUT: General rule is the larger the table, the more memory is needed but the faster subsequent lookup operations will be.
FP_ENTRIES: The number of entries allowed in the cache.
By default if users are not using the autoconf system (IE ./configure --enable-fpecc) users can start by adding these to either wolfssl/wolfcrypt/settings.h or their own user_settings.h when defining WOLFSSL_USER_SETTINGS globally:
/* Fixed point cache (speeds repeated operations against same private key) */ #undef FP_ECC #define FP_ECC #ifdef FP_ECC /* Bits / Entries */ #undef FP_ENTRIES #define FP_ENTRIES 2 #undef FP_LUT #define FP_LUT 4 /* NOTE: FP_LUT must be between 2 and 12 inclusively */ #endif
Users can pre-cache fixed points on a curve related to a specific private key prior to establishing a connection to speed up shared secret computation times. Below we have provided some sample code users might use to accomplish this “pre-caching”. Ideally this would be a function you would run on system start-up or initialization of your embedded device prior to establishing a connection:
#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> /* NOTE: ALWAYS include options.h or settings.h before any other wolf headers */ #include <wolfssl/options.h> #include <wolfssl/wolfcrypt/settings.h> #include <wolfssl/wolfcrypt/ecc.h> #include <wolfssl/wolfcrypt/asn.h> /* Build wolfSSL using ./configure --enable-fpecc or by adding #define FP_ECC to your user_settings.h. */ /* Fixed client ECC key */ static const unsigned char ecc_clikey_der_256[] = { 0x30, 0x77, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x04, 0x20, 0xF8, 0xCF, 0x92, 0x6B, 0xBD, 0x1E, 0x28, 0xF1, 0xA8, 0xAB, 0xA1, 0x23, 0x4F, 0x32, 0x74, 0x18, 0x88, 0x50, 0xAD, 0x7E, 0xC7, 0xEC, 0x92, 0xF8, 0x8F, 0x97, 0x4D, 0xAF, 0x56, 0x89, 0x65, 0xC7, 0xA0, 0x0A, 0x06, 0x08, 0x2A, 0x86, 0x48, 0xCE, 0x3D, 0x03, 0x01, 0x07, 0xA1, 0x44, 0x03, 0x42, 0x00, 0x04, 0x55, 0xBF, 0xF4, 0x0F, 0x44, 0x50, 0x9A, 0x3D, 0xCE, 0x9B, 0xB7, 0xF0, 0xC5, 0x4D, 0xF5, 0x70, 0x7B, 0xD4, 0xEC, 0x24, 0x8E, 0x19, 0x80, 0xEC, 0x5A, 0x4C, 0xA2, 0x24, 0x03, 0x62, 0x2C, 0x9B, 0xDA, 0xEF, 0xA2, 0x35, 0x12, 0x43, 0x84, 0x76, 0x16, 0xC6, 0x56, 0x95, 0x06, 0xCC, 0x01, 0xA9, 0xBD, 0xF6, 0x75, 0x1A, 0x42, 0xF7, 0xBD, 0xA9, 0xB2, 0x36, 0x22, 0x5F, 0xC7, 0x5D, 0x7F, 0xB4 }; static const int sizeof_ecc_clikey_der_256 = sizeof(ecc_clikey_der_256); int pre_cache_my_priv_key(void) { int ret; /* If we plan on caching fixed points for ECC operations... */ #ifdef FP_ECC word32 idx = 0; WC_RNG rng; ecc_key dummyPubKey; ecc_key myPrivKey; word32 x = 32; /* large enough for 256-bit */ unsigned char exportBuf[x]; wc_ecc_init(&dummyPubKey); wc_InitRng(&rng); ret = wc_ecc_make_key(&rng, 32, &dummyPubKey); if (ret != 0) { printf("Failed to make the public key\n"); return -1; } ret = wc_EccPrivateKeyDecode(ecc_clikey_der_256, &idx, &myPrivKey, sizeof_ecc_clikey_der_256); if (ret != 0) { printf("Failed to import private key, ret = %d\n", ret); return -1; } ret = wc_ecc_shared_secret(&myPrivKey, &dummyPubKey, exportBuf, &x); wc_ecc_free(&dummyPubKey); if (ret != 0) { printf("Failed to generate a shared secret\n"); return -1; } printf("Successfully pre-cached curve points!\n"); #else ret = 0; #endif return ret; } int main(void) { int ret; wolfSSL_Init(); ret = pre_cache_my_priv_key(); /* Do other interesting things, establish a TLS connection, etc. */ wolfSSL_Cleanup(); /* Calls the wc_ecc_fp_free() function to free cache resources */ return 0; }
If you have any questions on the above solution please contact us anytime at support@wolfssl.com! If you have feedback or comments please send a note to facts@wolfssl.com we would love to hear from you!
TLS 1.3 combined with FIPS (#FIPS #TLS13)
wolfSSL is a lightweight TLS/SSL library that is targeted for embedded devices and systems. It has support for the TLS 1.3 protocol, which is a secure protocol for transporting data between devices and across the Internet. In addition, wolfSSL uses the wolfCrypt encryption library to handle its data encryption.
Because there is a FIPS 140-2 validated version of wolfCrypt, this means that wolfSSL not only has support for the most current version of TLS, but it also has the encryption backbone to support your FIPS 140-2 needs if required.
Some key benefits of combining TLS 1.3 with FIPS validated software include:
- Software becomes marketable to federal agencies - without FIPS, a federal agency is not able to use cryptographic-based software
- Single round trip
- 0-RTT (a mode that enable zero round trip time)
- After Server Hello, all handshake messages are encrypted.
And much more! For more information regarding the benefits of using TLS 1.3 or using the FIPS validated version of wolfCrypt, check out wolfSSL's TLS 1.3 Protocol Support and our wolfCrypt FIPS page.
FIPS 140-2 is a government validation that certifies that an encryption module has successfully passed rigorous testing and meets high encryption standards as specified by NIST. For more information or details on FIPS 140-2, it may be helpful to view this Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIPS_140-2
For more details about wolfSSL, TLS 1.3, or if you have any other general inquiries please contact facts@wolfssl.com
To find out more about FIPS, check out the NIST FIPS publications or contact fips@wolfssl.com
Using cURL with wolfSSL and TLS 1.3
cURL is an open-source project that provides the command line tool, curl, for transferring data between client and server with URLs, powered by cURL’s library, libcurl. curl and libcurl both provide support for building SSL/TLS libraries, including wolfSSL! The latest version of cURL can be downloaded from https://github.com/curl/curl.
To build curl with wolfSSL, simply configure and install curl with:
$ ./configure --with-wolfssl --without-ssl $ make && make install
Starting with version 7.52.0, curl provides TLS 1.3 support when built with a TLS library. TLS 1.3 protocol support is also currently available in the wolfSSL library. Since both curl and wolfSSL support TLS 1.3, curl can be compiled with the addition of wolfSSL to select the TLS 1.3 protocol.
Configuring wolfSSL and curl to implement TLS 1.3 is simple. To build curl and libcurl with wolfSSL, wolfSSL must first be configured with TLS 1.3 support.
To enable TLS 1.3 support in wolfSSL, compile and install wolfSSL with the “–enable-tls13” option:
$ ./configure --enable-tls13 $ make && make install
Then, build curl with TLS 1.3-enabled wolfSSL:
$ ./configure --with-wolfssl --without-ssl $ make && make install
To test a TLS 1.3 connection with curl + wolfSSL, invoke curl with the –tlsv1.3 option on a server that supports TLS 1.3. For example:
$ curl --tlsv1.3 https://enabled.tls13.com/
A successful connection will return the HTML page downloaded from https://enabled.tls13.com/:
<html> <head> <title>Test</title> </head> <body> <h1>Test</h1> <p>Testing</p> </body> </html>
For more information on the cURL project, visit https://curl.haxx.se/
If you would like more information about wolfSSL’s support for TLS 1.3 or help on using it in your application, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com.
wolfSSH Manual Now Available
The wolfSSH Manual is now available on the wolfSSL website! It is easily navigable, descriptive, and detailed.
Some of the topics covered in the manual are listed below:
- How to build wolfSSH
- How to run the example applications
- Library design
- wolfSSH User Authentication Callback
- Callback Function Setup API
- wolfSSH SFTP Beta Introduction
- wolfSSH API reference
- And more!
The wolfSSH Manual can be viewed as HTML here: https://www.wolfssl.com/docs/wolfssh-manual/
Or downloaded as a PDF here: https://www.wolfssl.com/documentation/wolfSSH-Manual.pdf
wolfSSL Intel SGX (#SGX) + FIPS 140-2 (#FIPS140)!
wolfSSL is pleased to announce the following addition to the wolfSSL FIPS certificate!
Debian 8.7.0 | Intel ® Xeon® E3 Family with SGX support | Intel®x64 Server System R1304SP |
Windows 10 Pro | Intel ® Core TM i5 with SGX support | Dell LatitudeTM 7480 |
The wolfCrypt FIPS validated cryptographic module has been validated while running inside an Intel SGX enclave and examples have been setup for both Linux and Windows environments.
Intel ® SGX (Software Guard Extensions) can be thought of as a black-box where no other application running on the same device can see inside regardless of privilege. From a security standpoint this means that even if a malicious actor were to gain complete control of a system including root privileges, that actor, no matter what they tried, would not be able to access data inside of this “black-box”.
An Intel enclave is a form of user-level Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) which can provide both storage and execution. Meaning one can store sensitive information inside and also move sensitive portions of a program or an entire application inside.
While testing, wolfSSL has placed both individual functions and entire applications inside the enclave. One of the wolfSSL examples shows a client inside the enclave with the only entry/exit points being “start_client”, “read”, and “write”. The client is pre-programmed with a peer to connect with and specific functionality. When “start_client” is invoked it connects to the peer using SSL/TLS and executes the pre-programmed tasks where the only data entering and leaving the enclave is the info being sent to and received from the peer. Other examples show placing a single cryptographic operation inside the enclave, passing in plain-text data and receiving back encrypted data masking execution of the cryptographic operations.
If you are working with SGX and need FIPS validated crypto running in an enclave contact us at fips@wolfssl.com or support@wolfssl.com with any questions. We would love the opportunity to field your questions and hear about your project!
Weekly updates
Archives
- November 2024 (26)
- October 2024 (18)
- September 2024 (21)
- August 2024 (24)
- July 2024 (27)
- June 2024 (22)
- May 2024 (28)
- April 2024 (29)
- March 2024 (21)
- February 2024 (18)
- January 2024 (21)
- December 2023 (20)
- November 2023 (20)
- October 2023 (23)
- September 2023 (17)
- August 2023 (25)
- July 2023 (39)
- June 2023 (13)
- May 2023 (11)
- April 2023 (6)
- March 2023 (23)
- February 2023 (7)
- January 2023 (7)
- December 2022 (15)
- November 2022 (11)
- October 2022 (8)
- September 2022 (7)
- August 2022 (12)
- July 2022 (7)
- June 2022 (14)
- May 2022 (10)
- April 2022 (11)
- March 2022 (12)
- February 2022 (22)
- January 2022 (12)
- December 2021 (13)
- November 2021 (27)
- October 2021 (11)
- September 2021 (14)
- August 2021 (10)
- July 2021 (16)
- June 2021 (13)
- May 2021 (9)
- April 2021 (13)
- March 2021 (24)
- February 2021 (22)
- January 2021 (18)
- December 2020 (19)
- November 2020 (11)
- October 2020 (3)
- September 2020 (20)
- August 2020 (11)
- July 2020 (7)
- June 2020 (14)
- May 2020 (13)
- April 2020 (14)
- March 2020 (4)
- February 2020 (21)
- January 2020 (18)
- December 2019 (7)
- November 2019 (16)
- October 2019 (14)
- September 2019 (18)
- August 2019 (16)
- July 2019 (8)
- June 2019 (9)
- May 2019 (28)
- April 2019 (27)
- March 2019 (15)
- February 2019 (10)
- January 2019 (16)
- December 2018 (24)
- November 2018 (9)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (15)
- August 2018 (5)
- July 2018 (15)
- June 2018 (29)
- May 2018 (12)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (18)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (11)
- December 2017 (5)
- November 2017 (12)
- October 2017 (5)
- September 2017 (7)
- August 2017 (6)
- July 2017 (11)
- June 2017 (7)
- May 2017 (9)
- April 2017 (5)
- March 2017 (6)
- January 2017 (8)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (15)
- September 2016 (6)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (9)
- May 2016 (4)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (4)
- February 2016 (9)
- January 2016 (6)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (6)
- October 2015 (5)
- September 2015 (5)
- August 2015 (8)
- July 2015 (7)
- June 2015 (9)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (12)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (6)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (11)
- August 2014 (5)
- July 2014 (9)
- June 2014 (10)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (9)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (5)
- December 2013 (7)
- November 2013 (4)
- October 2013 (7)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (9)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (4)
- May 2013 (7)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (3)
- January 2013 (8)
- December 2012 (12)
- November 2012 (5)
- October 2012 (7)
- September 2012 (3)
- August 2012 (6)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (3)
- May 2012 (4)
- April 2012 (6)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (5)
- January 2012 (7)
- December 2011 (5)
- November 2011 (7)
- October 2011 (5)
- September 2011 (6)
- August 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (7)
- May 2011 (11)
- April 2011 (4)
- March 2011 (12)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (11)
- December 2010 (17)
- November 2010 (12)
- October 2010 (11)
- September 2010 (9)
- August 2010 (20)
- July 2010 (12)
- June 2010 (7)
- May 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (1)