RECENT BLOG NEWS
Some Notes on Testing wolfSSL
We are often asked about how we test wolfSSL. At this point, we believe we have testing that is quite robust, but we acknowledge that there is no such thing as perfect testing. With that knowledge in mind, we have the goal of incrementally improving and automating our testing rigs over time. Our overriding goal in testing is to have the most advanced and robust and ever improving testing that we can, subject to our resources.
We used to think of our testing plans in terms of a hierarchy, but we`ve improved on that thinking over time. We currently represent our testing as a series of concentric universes, with each successively larger universe being vastly larger and more complex than the smaller one inside of it. We`ll post some pictures in upcoming blog posts. For now, here`s a rough representation of our testing universes in order of sequence:
1. Build options: We have an extremely large number of build option combinations. So our most basic test universe is to build successfully with every possible combination of options.
2. API testing: We test every available call in a particular build.
3. Connection testing and data passing variables: We start with simple connection tests with limited data transmitted and then gradually dial up complexity.
4. Interop: We test for interoperability with the other open source TLS implementations, including OpenSSL and GnuTLS.
5. We then connect to unknown servers in the real world.
6. We then build with a series of `real` applications, like cURL, wget, pppd, etc. For some of our customers with top level support, we build the new release with their application.
7. Finally, we engage in another ever expanding universe of benchmark testing, where we look at sizing, transmission rates, connection speeds, etc. More to come on that topic, as it is quite popular!
Much of our effort is automated by Jenkins (hat tip to that project!). Thanks for listening. If you have specific questions about how we test, please contact us at facts@wolfssl.com.
Reduce Packet Data Overhead in M2M applications with wolfSSL
Many of our customers use the wolfSSL lightweight SSL/TLS package in M2M applications where usage is charged based on data transfer. As such, it becomes important to minimize data transfer rates when running SSL. Here are a few thoughts on how wolfSSL M2M users can minimize data packet overhead when implementing our embedded SSL:
1) Use a stream cipher like RC4, HC-128, or RABBIT. Stream ciphers don`t require padding, this will save at least half the cipher`s block size per message.
2) Use session resumption as much as possible. TLS session resumption uses less round trips and about 1/3 of the data compared to a full handshake, depending on certificate sizes and the certificate chain length mainly. wolfSSL now has a built-in client session cache so using session resumption no longer places a burden on the application developer to map remote servers with session instances.
3) Only sending the peer certificate instead of certificate chains can greatly reduce the data usage of a full TLS handshake. This will require the receiver to know about the root CAs and intermediate CAs ahead of time but it can often be worth it.
4) Use the shortest MAC you can, but still with good security. This is probably SHA1 for now. As more implementations begin to support truncated HMAC you could have the best of both. SHA-384 for example, but truncated to 10 bytes.
5) Group output messages. wolfSSL has the ability to send each TLS record individually or to send each group as flight. This is a small savings, mainly in IP/TCP/TLS record headers but it adds up over time.
6) Use compression at the TLS level if you`re not doing it at the application level. No sense in doing it twice though.
Using Maximum Fragment Length with wolfSSL
Did you like the addition of SNI in the last wolfSSL release? If so, you probably will like the Maximum Fragment Length extension as well!
TLS specifies a fixed maximum plaintext fragment length of 2^14 bytes. It may be desirable for constrained clients to negotiate a smaller maximum fragment length due to memory or bandwidth limitations. To enable the usage of Maximum Fragment Length at wolfSSL you can simply do:
./configure –enable-maxfragment
Using Maximum Fragment Length on the client side requires an additional function call, which should be one of the following functions:
wolfSSL_CTX_UseMaxFragment()
wolfSSL_UseMaxFragment()
wolfSSL_CTX_UseMaxFragment() is most recommended when the client would like to contact the same server multiple times with the same configuration. Setting the Maximum Fragment Length extension at context level will enable it in all SSL objects created from that same context from the moment of the call forward.
wolfSSL_UseMaxFragment() will enable it for one SSL object only, so it`s recommended to use this function when the maximum possible length between sessions changes.
On the server side no call is required. The server will automatically attend to the client`s request for Maximum Fragment Length. It is the client`s responsibility to choose the proper length.
Both SNI and Maximum Fragment Length extensions can be enabled with either:
./configure –enable-sni –enable-maxfragment
OR
./configure –enable-tlsx
If you have any questions about using Maximum Fragment Length with TLS please let us know at facts@wolfssl.com.
Gearman Now Supports wolfSSL
We would like to announce to our community that Gearman, a framework designed to distribute tasks to multiple machines or processes, now has SSL/TLS support using the wolfSSL lightweight SSL library.
From the Gearman site, Gearman “allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events. In other words, it is the nervous system for how distributed processing communicates.”
If you are interested in using Gearman with wolfSSL, Brian Aker explains how to do so in this Google Groups post: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/gearman/kHvarqZ6OYk.
Gearman: http://www.gearman.org/
wolfSSL Release 2.7.0 Now Available
The bi-monthly release of wolfSSL, 2.7.0, is now ready to download from our website. New features include:
– SNI (Server Name Indication) for both the client and server with –enable-sni
– KEIL MDK-ARM project files in IDE/MDK-ARM
– Domain name match checks now included wildcard and Subject altname checks by default
– More consistent error returns across all APIs
– Authority Subject ID support for Certificate matching
– Persistent session and certificate cache functionality
– Client session table lookups at the library level instead of making the application cache the sessions
– Camellia support for the SSL sniffer
– User controllable settings for DTLS timeout values
– DTLS reliability enhancements for the handshake
– Better ThreadX support out of the box
Please see the README and our on-line documentation for more information or feel free to contact us.
Born in the USA!
We receive a lot of questions about the origins of the CyaSSL lightweight SSL library and wolfCrypt software packages. We get asked where they were developed, and by who? These questions usually come from US government agencies and their contractors. Simply stated, mes amis, CyaSSL and wolfCrypt were Born in the USA and written by US citizens.
If you have any additional questions about the origins of CyaSSL or wolfCrypt, please contact us at facts@wolfssl.com
Documentation for using wolfSSL with Keil MDK-ARM
The wolfSSL lightweight SSL package is used by a healthy chunk of Keil users. In the interest of better enabling our Keil MDK-ARM users, we`ve added MDK-ARM 4 support and documented it here: http://www.yassl.com/yaSSL/cyassl-keil-mdk-arm.html.
What`s next? MDK-ARM 5 support. MDK-ARM 5 will make setup and integration even easier! Let us know if you are interested in beta testing wolfSSL with MDK-ARM 5 at facts@wolfssl.com.
wolfCrypt and wolfSSL Separation
Up to now, wolfCrypt cryptography library users have had to use it as a part of wolfSSL. We are now embarking on the project to separate the two, and when finished should have a separate wolfCrypt download for our users that only need to use our crypto. Our goals are to make the separate downloads easy to maintain and easy to set up. If you are a wolfCrypt user, and have concerns or comments on how we do this, then please contact us at facts@wolfssl.com.
Using Server Name Indication (SNI) with wolfSSL
Have you ever wondered how to use SNI with the wolfSSL embedded SSL library? SNI is useful when a server hosts multiple
‘virtual’ servers at a single underlying network address. It may be desirable for clients to provide the name of the server which it is contacting. To enable SNI with wolfSSL you can simply do:
./configure –enable-sni
Using SNI on the client side requires an additional function call, which should be one of the following functions:
wolfSSL_CTX_UseSNI()
wolfSSL_UseSNI()
wolfSSL_CTX_UseSNI() is most recommended when the client contacts the same server multiple times. Setting the SNI extension at the context level will enable the SNI usage in all SSL objects created from that same context from the moment of the call forward.
wolfSSL_UseSNI() will enable SNI usage for one SSL object only, so it is recommended to use this function when the server name changes between sessions.
On the server side one of the same function calls is required. Since the wolfSSL server doesn`t host multiple `virtual` servers, the SNI usage is useful when the termination of the connection is desired in the case of SNI mismatch. In this scenario, wolfSSL_CTX_UseSNI() will be more efficient, as the server will set it only once per context creating all subsequent SSL objects with SNI from that same context.
If you have any questions about using SNI with TLS please let us know at facts@wolfssl.com.
wolfSSL Support for Microchip TCP/IP Version 6
Are you interested in using the wolfSSL lightweight SSL/TLS library with version 6 of the Microchip TCP/IP stack? If so, you’re in luck! We recently added support for version 6 to wolfSSL. Now wolfSSL supports running on top of either version 5 or version 6 of the stack.
We have updated not only our library source code, but also our example PIC32 SSL client and server. You can find more details on our PIC32-specific webpage, here: http://yassl.com/yaSSL/cyassl-pic32.html.
To download the latest version of wolfSSL with support for Microchip TCP/IP version 6, please see our GitHub repository (https://github.com/cyassl/cyassl). Support will also roll into our next stable release of wolfSSL in June.
wolfSSL Product Page: http://yassl.com/yaSSL/Products-cyassl.html
Microchip TCP/IP Stack: https://www.microchip.com/SWLibraryWeb/product.aspx?product=TCPIPSTACK
Weekly updates
Archives
- December 2024 (18)
- November 2024 (29)
- October 2024 (18)
- September 2024 (21)
- August 2024 (24)
- July 2024 (27)
- June 2024 (22)
- May 2024 (28)
- April 2024 (29)
- March 2024 (21)
- February 2024 (18)
- January 2024 (21)
- December 2023 (20)
- November 2023 (20)
- October 2023 (23)
- September 2023 (17)
- August 2023 (25)
- July 2023 (39)
- June 2023 (13)
- May 2023 (11)
- April 2023 (6)
- March 2023 (23)
- February 2023 (7)
- January 2023 (7)
- December 2022 (15)
- November 2022 (11)
- October 2022 (8)
- September 2022 (7)
- August 2022 (12)
- July 2022 (7)
- June 2022 (14)
- May 2022 (10)
- April 2022 (11)
- March 2022 (12)
- February 2022 (22)
- January 2022 (12)
- December 2021 (13)
- November 2021 (27)
- October 2021 (11)
- September 2021 (14)
- August 2021 (10)
- July 2021 (16)
- June 2021 (13)
- May 2021 (9)
- April 2021 (13)
- March 2021 (24)
- February 2021 (22)
- January 2021 (18)
- December 2020 (19)
- November 2020 (11)
- October 2020 (3)
- September 2020 (20)
- August 2020 (11)
- July 2020 (7)
- June 2020 (14)
- May 2020 (13)
- April 2020 (14)
- March 2020 (4)
- February 2020 (21)
- January 2020 (18)
- December 2019 (7)
- November 2019 (16)
- October 2019 (14)
- September 2019 (18)
- August 2019 (16)
- July 2019 (8)
- June 2019 (9)
- May 2019 (28)
- April 2019 (27)
- March 2019 (15)
- February 2019 (10)
- January 2019 (16)
- December 2018 (24)
- November 2018 (9)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (15)
- August 2018 (5)
- July 2018 (15)
- June 2018 (29)
- May 2018 (12)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (18)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (11)
- December 2017 (5)
- November 2017 (12)
- October 2017 (5)
- September 2017 (7)
- August 2017 (6)
- July 2017 (11)
- June 2017 (7)
- May 2017 (9)
- April 2017 (5)
- March 2017 (6)
- January 2017 (8)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (15)
- September 2016 (6)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (9)
- May 2016 (4)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (4)
- February 2016 (9)
- January 2016 (6)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (6)
- October 2015 (5)
- September 2015 (5)
- August 2015 (8)
- July 2015 (7)
- June 2015 (9)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (12)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (6)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (11)
- August 2014 (5)
- July 2014 (9)
- June 2014 (10)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (9)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (5)
- December 2013 (7)
- November 2013 (4)
- October 2013 (7)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (9)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (4)
- May 2013 (7)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (3)
- January 2013 (8)
- December 2012 (12)
- November 2012 (5)
- October 2012 (7)
- September 2012 (3)
- August 2012 (6)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (3)
- May 2012 (4)
- April 2012 (6)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (5)
- January 2012 (7)
- December 2011 (5)
- November 2011 (7)
- October 2011 (5)
- September 2011 (6)
- August 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (7)
- May 2011 (11)
- April 2011 (4)
- March 2011 (12)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (11)
- December 2010 (17)
- November 2010 (12)
- October 2010 (11)
- September 2010 (9)
- August 2010 (20)
- July 2010 (12)
- June 2010 (7)
- May 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (1)