RECENT BLOG NEWS
Live Webinar: Getting Started with wolfTPM
We are excited to invite you to the 4th episode of our Getting Started series: “Getting Started with wolfTPM”! This informative webinar, led by wolfSSL’s Senior Embedded Software Engineer, David Garske, is scheduled for March 21st at 10 am PT.
Watch the webinar here: Getting Started with wolfTPM
David will delve into how you can start to leverage wolfTPM to elevate the security of your systems. He will guide you through steps for getting started on your platform with wolfTPM.
During the webinar, you will:
- Gain basic knowledge of TPM 2.0
- Explore build options for wolfTPM
- Learn how to use wolfTPM API
- Engage in a comprehensive API comparison of wolfTPM
- Delve into real-life wolfTPM use case examples
And much more!
Don’t miss this opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of TPM technology and discover how wolfTPM can shield your systems against emerging threats. Watch now.
As always, our webinars will include Q&A sessions throughout. If you have questions about any of the above, please contact us at facts@wolfSSL.com or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Download wolfSSL Now
wolfSSL gRPC Support
wolfSSL is adding support for the gRPC (https://grpc.io/) project. gRPC is an open source high performance Remote Procedure Call (RPC) framework that can run in any environment. RPC is commonly used to execute procedures or subroutines in other computers on a network. This networking requires security and this is where wolfSSL comes in.
wolfSSL is a lightweight TLS library with a focus on embedded systems. wolfSSL implements protocols up to the latest TLS 1.3 and DTLS 1.3 standards and can run on any architecture or operating system. gRPC uses TLS to provide authentication and confidentiality when executing calls on remote computers.
Work on wolfSSL support in gRPC is currently in progress. If you are interested in using gRPC with wolfSSL or have any questions, please contact us at facts@wolfSSL.com or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Download wolfSSL Now
Securing Satellite Communications: Insights from Eric Blankenhorn and wolfSSL at Satellite 2024
wolfSSL returns to Satellite 2024 this year, with Senior Software Engineer Eric Blankenhorn taking the spotlight as a featured speaker for the conference program, “Fortifying the Skies: Space Defenders on the Frontlines of Cybersecurity”. Scheduled for March 21st at 9:30 am ET in room 146C, this program is a pivotal opportunity to delve into the evolving landscape of the space domain and address the critical need for securing satellite networks.
As the space domain continues to evolve and expand, ensuring the security and resilience of satellite networks is crucial. This conference program offers a unique platform to engage with industry leaders, gain invaluable insights, and collectively work towards a more secure future in space.
Eric, alongside other industry experts, will explore various topics including emerging threats in satellites and space, the development of standards and best practice for satellite cybersecurity, the convergence of IT & OT security, and strategies for securing the space supply chain.
Conference Program Details:
- Title: Fortifying the Skies: Space Defenders on the Frontlines of Cybersecurity
- Date: March 21st | 9:30 am ET
- Location: Room 146C
Make sure to mark your calendar and seize this opportunity to learn about securing satellite networks from cyber attacks and enhancing their resilience against evolving threats.
The wolfSSL will be available at booth 1445 during Satellite 2024 to address any inquiries. Don’t forget to swing by. Let’s safeguard satellite communication together.
If you have questions about any of the above or would like to schedule a one-on-one meeting with wolfSSL at Satellite 2024, please contact us at facts@wolfSSL.com or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Download wolfSSL Now
How to Build wolfSSL for Android
Here at wolfSSL we provide best in class support by using our past experience to know what you will ask and then having examples, documentation and instructions already prepared before you even open a support ticket with us.
A great example of this is the recent uptick in questions about building our wolfSSL library for Android. If you’re building an Android app and have FIPS 140 needs then you’ve come to the right place!
Want to see an Android NDK Gradle example?
How about just a standalone toolchain example?
There is also the ability to replace BoringSSL. Have a look at
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/tree/master/IDE/Android
Another thing you might be thinking of is wolfSSL JNI and JSSE! You’ll want to have a look at
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssljni?tab=readme-ov-file#building-for-android
Perhaps you’re using OpenSSL on Android and you have FIPS 140 requirements. Have a look at https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfProvider/tree/master/IDE/Android
When it comes to Android, we’ve got you covered. And if you need further details or clarifications, we are always happy to help you. Please reach out to facts@wolfSSL.com or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Download wolfSSL Now
Partner Webinar: wolfSSL and Cesium RTOS Integration
Get Excited! wolfSSL is partnering with Weston Embedded Solutions to host an exclusive webinar, wolfSSL and Cesium RTOS Integration. We will explore the intricate world of secure communication in an RTOS environment. Led by wolfSSL’s Senior Software Developer, Anthony Hu, and Weston Embedded’s President and co-founder, Janos Magasrevy, along with Senior Software Engineer and co-founder at Weston Embedded, Yanko Sosa.
Weston Embedded Solutions is a leading provider of embedded software and engineering services, specializing in the Micrium µC/OS and Cesium RTOS family of products. This webinar presents a unique opportunity to delve into the fundamentals of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and its pivotal role in securing data transmission. Discover the capabilities of Cs/NET and its seamless integration with wolfSSL’s cutting-edge security solutions.
Watch the webinar here: wolfSSL and Cesium RTOS Integration (Partner Webinar with Weston Embedded)
You are expecting to learn:
- Learn fundamental of wolfSSL TLS
- Dive into Weston Embedded’s Cs/NET integration with wolfSSL
- Live Demonstration of Cs/NET’s HTTP Client in Action Using TLS v1.3
And much more!
Learn from industry experts as they share valuable insights and best practices in secure communication protocols, Watch it now.
As always, our webinars will include Q&A sessions throughout. If you have questions about any of the above, please contact us at facts@wolfSSL.com or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Download wolfSSL Now
wolfSSL’s Kyber ML-KEM Implementation Now Included Free of Charge for Commercial Customers; Future Proofing is here today
We are now including commercial Kyber/ML-KEM in our wolfSSL/wolfCrypt commercial packages. At this point, you need to ask our support organization for a delivery if you want to start testing it. If you are willing to wait, then you will find it included in the next commercial bundle that we release. In summary, there will be no additional charge if you are a supported customer of wolfSSL/wolfCrypt.
Please note all of the advantages of our Kyber implementation from the previous blog posting here.
This begs the question, what about customers who have let their support plan lapse? Our answer is “What are you waiting for?!?”. Get started by reviewing our support packages. The next step is to get in contact with your wolfSSL business director and get signed up. You can do that by sending a message to facts@wolfssl.com.
To get an idea of the kind of performance you will get, see our benchmarks here:
Start your future proofing today and get started with post-quantum algorithms! Want wolfSSL’s implementation of Dilithium? Interested in LMS and XMSS? Let’s talk! CNSA 2.0 requirements? We can help. Contact us at facts@wolfssl.com or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Download wolfSSL Now
Support for wolfBoot on Renesas RZ/N2L
We are excited to announce wolfBoot support for the Renesas RZ/N2L evaluation board. The Renesas RZ/N2L uses the high-performance Arm Cortex-R52 core to easily add network functionality onto industrial equipment and machines. The RZ/N2L is supported by an open and flexible ecosystem concept – the Flexible Software Package (FSP), built on FreeRTOS – and is expandable to use other RTOS and middleware.
wolfBoot is a portable secure bootloader solution that offers firmware authentication and firmware update mechanisms. Due to its minimalistic design and tiny HAL API, wolfBoot is completely independent from any OS or bare-metal application.
By adding wolfBoot support for the evaluation board, it demonstrates simple secure firmware boot from external flash memory by wolfBoot. The example uses SPI boot with external flash memory on the evaluation board. On this boot mode, wolfBoot is copied to the internal RAM(B-TCM). wolfBoot copies the application program from external flash memory to RAM(System RAM). As a final step of wolfBoot the entry point of the copied application program is called if the integrity and authenticity of the image are valid. More detailed steps can be found here.
If interested in wolfBoot support on the RZ/N2L, or if you have questions about any of the above, please contact facts@wolfSSL.com or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Download wolfSSL Now
wolfSSL Supports Nucleus RTOS
The Nucleus RTOS uses wolfSSL to provide TLS security. The wolfSSL embedded SSL library is a lightweight SSL/TLS library written in ANSI C and targeted for embedded, RTOS, and resource-constrained environments – primarily because of its small size, speed, and feature set. wolfSSL supports industry standards up to the current TLS 1.3 and DTLS 1.3 protocol levels, is up to 20 times smaller than OpenSSL, and offers progressive ciphers such as ChaCha20, Curve25519, NTRU, and SHA-3.
Additionally, Nucleus employs wolfSSH to provide a client and server SSH library. The wolfSSH library is a lightweight SSHv2 client and server library written in ANSI C and targeted for embedded, RTOS, and resource-constrained environments – primarily because of its small size, speed, and feature set.
Adding FIPS certified cryptography to your Nucleus project is easily accomplished using wolfCrypt FIPS. A version of the wolfCrypt cryptography library has been FIPS 140-2 validated (Certificate #3389), with FIPS 140-3 validation currently in progress!
If you have questions about any of the above, please contact us at facts@wolfSSL.com or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Download wolfSSL Now
Post-Quantum Kyber Benchmarks (ARM Cortex-M4)
Hot on the heels of our MacOS benchmarks, we now have our Kyber Benchmarks for Arm Cortex-M4.
Before getting into the numbers, some information on the conditions under which the benchmarks were taken:
- The hardware platform was STM NUCLEO-F446ZE
- The HCLK in the project was set to 168MHz
- Only 1 core used
- wolfSSL Math Configuration set to “Single Precision ASM Cortex-M3+ Math”
- Optimization flag: -Ofast
- Conventional algorithms are present for comparison purposes
Here are our results:
RSA 2048 public 82 ops took 1.020 sec, avg 12.439 ms, 80.392 ops/sec RSA 2048 private 4 ops took 1.827 sec, avg 456.750 ms, 2.189 ops/sec DH 2048 key gen 5 ops took 1.181 sec, avg 236.200 ms, 4.234 ops/sec DH 2048 agree 6 ops took 1.419 sec, avg 236.500 ms, 4.228 ops/sec ECC SECP256R1 key gen 118 ops took 1.012 sec, avg 8.576 ms, 116.601 ops/sec ECDHE SECP256R1 agree 56 ops took 1.016 sec, avg 18.143 ms, 55.118 ops/sec KYBER512 128 key gen 232 ops took 1.004 sec, avg 4.328 ms, 231.076 ops/sec KYBER512 128 encap 192 ops took 1.008 sec, avg 5.250 ms, 190.476 ops/sec KYBER512 128 decap 178 ops took 1.004 sec, avg 5.640 ms, 177.291 ops/sec KYBER768 192 key gen 146 ops took 1.008 sec, avg 6.904 ms, 144.841 ops/sec KYBER768 192 encap 118 ops took 1.008 sec, avg 8.542 ms, 117.063 ops/sec KYBER768 192 decap 110 ops took 1.000 sec, avg 9.091 ms, 110.000 ops/sec KYBER1024 256 key gen 92 ops took 1.011 sec, avg 10.989 ms, 90.999 ops/sec KYBER1024 256 encap 76 ops took 1.000 sec, avg 13.158 ms, 76.000 ops/sec KYBER1024 256 decap 72 ops took 1.000 sec, avg 13.889 ms, 72.000 ops/sec
Our implementation of Kyber’s performance is looking great compared to all the other algorithms. It might appear that ECDHE comes close, but not when you consider the mechanics of a key exchange.
Note that ECDHE is a NIKE (Non-Interactive Key Exchange) while Kyber is a KEM (Key Encapsulation Mechanism) so in the context of TLS 1.3, the numbers as they stand are misleading.
For NIKEs, both the server and the client must do the key generation operation. Then both the server and the client must also do the key agreement step. On the other hand, for KEMs, the client does key generation once, the server does encapsulation once, and the client does decapsulation once. Since NIKEs have double the number of operations to achieve a shared secret, for a fair comparison, we need to double the average time for ECDHE. In this light, the total time for a key exchange looks like this:
Algorithm | Total Time for Key Exchange |
---|---|
ECDH SECP256R1 | 26.719 ms |
Kyber512 (NIST Level 1) | 15.218 ms |
Kyber768 (NIST Level 3) | 24.537 ms |
Kyber1024 (NIST Level 5) | 38.036 ms |
Note that Kyber512, from a security perspective, is comparable to ECDH at SECP256R1.
The numbers speak for themselves: Kyber wins. That said, you can look forward to future optimizations and even better performance gains.
As we’ve noted in the past, Kyber has considerably larger artifacts than ECDHE, depending on your method of transmission, this margin can easily be lost if your transmission speeds are slow.
Want to see further optimizations to our Kyber implementation? Interested in wolfSSL’s other post-quantum algorithm implementations? Let us know so we can prioritize the things you are looking for.
If you have questions about any of the above, please contact us at facts@wolfSSL.com or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Download wolfSSL Now
Post-Quantum Kyber Benchmarks (MacOS)
You may be aware that wolfSSL has our own implementation of NIST’s ML-KEM, also known as Kyber. ML-KEM is the post-quantum KEM that is slated for standardization by NIST. While the standard is not complete yet, and we have not yet released our implementation into open source, we do have some benchmarking results to share.
Additionally, we should note some things about our implementation that make it unique and useful:
- It will be fully integrated with our other products, including wolfSSL, wolfBoot, curl, etc.
- It is a consumer of our highly optimized SP Math library, with more ML-KEM optimizations to come!
- Because our products are well integrated with many other open source packages, those packages can inherit Kyber/ML-KEM support.
- It supports bare metal, as well as all of the other operating systems we support, including FreeRTOS, VxWorks, Integrity, Zephyr, Itron, LynxOS, etc.
- It also supports all of the silicon targets we support, including ARM, RISCV, DSPs, FPGAs, intel, etc.
The benchmarks results follow:
Math: Multi-Precision: Wolf(SP) no-dyn-stack word-size=64 bits=4096 sp_int.c Single Precision: ecc 256 384 521 rsa/dh 2048 3072 4096 asm sp_arm64.c wolfCrypt Benchmark (block bytes 1048576, min 1.0 sec each) DH 2048 key gen 3997 ops took 1.000 sec, avg 0.250 ms, 3996.812 ops/sec DH 2048 agree 4100 ops took 1.001 sec, avg 0.244 ms, 4097.522 ops/sec KYBER512 128 key gen 96100 ops took 1.001 sec, avg 0.010 ms, 96037.765 ops/sec KYBER512 128 encap 78000 ops took 1.000 sec, avg 0.013 ms, 77970.220 ops/sec KYBER512 128 decap 58900 ops took 1.001 sec, avg 0.017 ms, 58867.158 ops/sec KYBER768 192 key gen 58200 ops took 1.000 sec, avg 0.017 ms, 58192.314 ops/sec KYBER768 192 encap 48700 ops took 1.001 sec, avg 0.021 ms, 48664.334 ops/sec KYBER768 192 decap 38100 ops took 1.001 sec, avg 0.026 ms, 38059.656 ops/sec KYBER1024 256 key gen 37800 ops took 1.003 sec, avg 0.027 ms, 37704.299 ops/sec KYBER1024 256 encap 32600 ops took 1.001 sec, avg 0.031 ms, 32566.427 ops/sec KYBER1024 256 decap 26000 ops took 1.001 sec, avg 0.039 ms, 25967.020 ops/sec ECC [ SECP256R1] 256 key gen 84100 ops took 1.001 sec, avg 0.012 ms, 84013.469 ops/sec ECDHE [ SECP256R1] 256 agree 24400 ops took 1.004 sec, avg 0.041 ms, 24300.995 ops/sec
The benchmarks were run on an Apple MacBook Pro 18,3 with an Apple M1 Pro, 3.09 GHz processor. Only 1 core was used. If you want to get the benchmark harness code, then ping us at facts@wolfSSL.com.
This data shows that for Kyber/ML-KEM, algorithm execution performance is rock solid. If you compare Kyber/ML-KEM’s numbers against DH and ECDHE, Kyber holds its own. To understand how to analyze and compare these number, see https://www.wolfssl.com/benchmarks-kyber-level-1-pqm4-integration-stm32-arm-cortex-m4/.
Interested in learning more about our post-quantum efforts? Want to understand how Kyber fits into different protocols and how it might affect your use case? Contact us at wolfSSL by emailing facts@wolfSSL.com or calling us at +1 425 245 8247 to reach out to your regional wolfSSL business director
Download wolfSSL Now
Weekly updates
Archives
- December 2024 (15)
- November 2024 (29)
- October 2024 (18)
- September 2024 (21)
- August 2024 (24)
- July 2024 (27)
- June 2024 (22)
- May 2024 (28)
- April 2024 (29)
- March 2024 (21)
- February 2024 (18)
- January 2024 (21)
- December 2023 (20)
- November 2023 (20)
- October 2023 (23)
- September 2023 (17)
- August 2023 (25)
- July 2023 (39)
- June 2023 (13)
- May 2023 (11)
- April 2023 (6)
- March 2023 (23)
- February 2023 (7)
- January 2023 (7)
- December 2022 (15)
- November 2022 (11)
- October 2022 (8)
- September 2022 (7)
- August 2022 (12)
- July 2022 (7)
- June 2022 (14)
- May 2022 (10)
- April 2022 (11)
- March 2022 (12)
- February 2022 (22)
- January 2022 (12)
- December 2021 (13)
- November 2021 (27)
- October 2021 (11)
- September 2021 (14)
- August 2021 (10)
- July 2021 (16)
- June 2021 (13)
- May 2021 (9)
- April 2021 (13)
- March 2021 (24)
- February 2021 (22)
- January 2021 (18)
- December 2020 (19)
- November 2020 (11)
- October 2020 (3)
- September 2020 (20)
- August 2020 (11)
- July 2020 (7)
- June 2020 (14)
- May 2020 (13)
- April 2020 (14)
- March 2020 (4)
- February 2020 (21)
- January 2020 (18)
- December 2019 (7)
- November 2019 (16)
- October 2019 (14)
- September 2019 (18)
- August 2019 (16)
- July 2019 (8)
- June 2019 (9)
- May 2019 (28)
- April 2019 (27)
- March 2019 (15)
- February 2019 (10)
- January 2019 (16)
- December 2018 (24)
- November 2018 (9)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (15)
- August 2018 (5)
- July 2018 (15)
- June 2018 (29)
- May 2018 (12)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (18)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (11)
- December 2017 (5)
- November 2017 (12)
- October 2017 (5)
- September 2017 (7)
- August 2017 (6)
- July 2017 (11)
- June 2017 (7)
- May 2017 (9)
- April 2017 (5)
- March 2017 (6)
- January 2017 (8)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (15)
- September 2016 (6)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (9)
- May 2016 (4)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (4)
- February 2016 (9)
- January 2016 (6)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (6)
- October 2015 (5)
- September 2015 (5)
- August 2015 (8)
- July 2015 (7)
- June 2015 (9)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (12)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (6)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (11)
- August 2014 (5)
- July 2014 (9)
- June 2014 (10)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (9)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (5)
- December 2013 (7)
- November 2013 (4)
- October 2013 (7)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (9)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (4)
- May 2013 (7)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (3)
- January 2013 (8)
- December 2012 (12)
- November 2012 (5)
- October 2012 (7)
- September 2012 (3)
- August 2012 (6)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (3)
- May 2012 (4)
- April 2012 (6)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (5)
- January 2012 (7)
- December 2011 (5)
- November 2011 (7)
- October 2011 (5)
- September 2011 (6)
- August 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (7)
- May 2011 (11)
- April 2011 (4)
- March 2011 (12)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (11)
- December 2010 (17)
- November 2010 (12)
- October 2010 (11)
- September 2010 (9)
- August 2010 (20)
- July 2010 (12)
- June 2010 (7)
- May 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (1)