RECENT BLOG NEWS
cURL Release – cURL 7.77.0 – 200 OK
This post has been cross posted from Daniel Stenberg’s blog – originally posted here.
Welcome to the 200th curl release. We call it 200 OK. It coincides with us counting more than 900 commit authors and surpassing 2,400 credited contributors in the project. This is also the first release ever in which we thank more than 80 persons in the RELEASE-NOTES for having helped out making it and we’ve set two new record in the bug-bounty program: the largest single payout ever for a single bug (2,000 USD) and the largest total payout during a single release cycle: 3,800 USD.
This release cycle was 42 days only, two weeks shorter than normal due to the previous 7.76.1 patch release.
Numbers
- the 200th release
- 5 changes
- 42 days (total: 8,468)
- 133 bug-fixes (total: 6,966)
- 192 commits (total: 27,202)
- 0 new public libcurl function (total: 85)
- 2 new curl_easy_setopt() option (total: 290)
- 2 new curl command line option (total: 242)
- 82 contributors, 44 new (total: 2,410)
- 47 authors, 23 new (total: 901)
- 3 security fixes (total: 103)
- 3,800 USD paid in Bug Bounties (total: 9,000 USD)
Security
We set two new records in the curl bug-bounty program this time as mentioned above. These are the issues that made them happen.
This is a Use-After-Free in the OpenSSL backend code that in the absolutely worst case can lead to an RCE, a Remote Code Execution. The flaw is reasonably recently added and it’s very hard to exploit but you should upgrade or patch immediately.
The issue occurs when TLS session related info is sent from the TLS server when the transfer that previously used it is already done and gone.
The reporter was awarded 2,000 USD for this finding.
When libcurl accepts custom TELNET options to send to the server, it the input parser was flawed which could be exploited to have libcurl instead send contents from the stack.
The reporter was awarded 1,000 USD for this finding.
In the Schannel backend code, the selected cipher for a transfer done with was stored in a static variable. This caused one transfer’s choice to weaken the choice for a single set transfer could unknowingly affect other connections to a lower security grade than intended.
The reporter was awarded 800 USD for this finding.
Changes
In this release we introduce 5 new changes that might be interesting to take a look at!
- Make TLS flavor explicit
As explained separately, the curl configure script no longer defaults to selecting a particular TLS library. When you build curl with configure now, you need to select which library to use. No special treatment for any of them!
- No more SSL
curl now has no more traces of support for SSLv2 or SSLv3. Those ancient and insecure SSL versions were already disabled by default by TLS libraries everywhere, but now it’s also impossible to activate them even in special build. Stripped out from both the curl tool and the library (thus counted as two changes).
- HSTS in the build
We brought HSTS support a while ago, but now we finally remove the experimental label and ship it enabled in the build by default for everyone to use it more easily.
- In-memory cert API
We introduce API options for libcurl that allow users to specify certificates in-memory instead of using files in the file system. See CURLOPT_CAINFO_BLOB.
Favorite bug-fixes
Again we manage to perform a large amount of fixes in this release, so I’m highlighting a few of the ones I find most interesting!
- Version output
The first line of curl -V output got updated: libcurl now includes OpenLDAP and its version of that was used in the build, and then the curl tool can add libmetalink and its version of that was used in the build!
- curl_mprintf: add description
We’ve provided the *printf() clone functions in the API since forever, but we’ve tried to discourage users from using them. Still, now we have a first shot at a man page that clearly describes how they work.
This is important as they’re not quite POSIX compliant and users who against our advice decide to rely on them need to be able to know how they work!
- CURLOPT_IPRESOLVE: preventing wrong IP version from being used
This option was made a little stricter than before. Previously, it would be lax about existing connections and prefer reuse instead of resolving again, but starting now this option makes sure to only use a connection with the request IP version.
This allows applications to explicitly create two separate connections to the same host using different IP versions when desired, which previously libcurl wouldn’t easily let you do.
- Ignore SIGPIPE in curl_easy_send
libcurl makes its best at ignoring SIGPIPE everywhere and here we identified a spot where we had missed it… We also made sure to enable the ignoring logic when built to use wolfSSL.
- Several HTTP/2-fixes
There are no less than 6 separate fixes mentioned in the HTTP/2 module in this release. Some potential memory leaks but also some more behavior improving things. Possibly the most important one was the move of the transfer-related error code from the connection struct to the transfers struct since it was vulnerable to a race condition that could make it wrong. Another related fix is that libcurl no longer forcibly disconnects a connection over which a transfer gets HTTP_1_1_REQUIRED returned.
- Partial CONNECT requests
When the CONNECT HTTP request sent to a proxy wasn’t all sent in a single send() call, curl would fail. It is baffling that this bug hasn’t been found or reported earlier but was detected this time when the reporter issued a CONNECT request that was larger than 16 kilobytes…
- TLS: add USE_HTTP2 define
There was several remaining bad assumptions that HTTP/2 support in curl relies purely on nghttp2. This is no longer true as HTTP/2 support can also be provide by hyper.
- normalize numerical IPv4 hosts
The URL parser now knows about the special IPv4 numerical formats and parses and normalizes URLs with numerical IPv4 addresses.
- Timeout, timed out libssh2 disconnects too
When libcurl (built with libssh2 support) stopped an SFTP transfer because a timeout was triggered, the following SFTP disconnect procedure was subsequently also stopped because of the same timeout and therefore wasn’t allowed to properly clean up everything, leading to a memory-leak!
IRC network switch
We moved the #curl IRC channel to the new network libera.chat. Come join us there!
Next release
On Jul 21, 2021 we plan to ship the next release. The version number for that is not yet decided but we have changes in the pipeline, making a minor version number bump very likely.
Support
- wolfSSL offers Curl support is available, and part of that support revenue goes into finding and fixing these kinds of vulnerabilities.
- Customers under curl support can get advice on whether or not the advisories apply to them.
- 24×7 support on curl is available, and can include pre-notification of upcoming vulnerability announcements.
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Command-line Utility: Here’s What We’re Adding Next
wolfSSL has a command-line utility, it’s called wolfCLU. As promised, here’s a sneak peek of notable additions to wolfCLU that are coming soon:
- PKEY and certificate public key output
- Certificate request creation
- Updates to human readable text output of certificates
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Download wolfCLU: https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl-examples/tree/master/wolfCLU
Love it? Star us on GitHub!
Did You Know We Have a Command-line Utility?
In case you didn’t know, wolfSSL has a portable command line utility. You can download wolfCLU on Github today for use with the wolfSSL embedded SSL/TLS library! wolfCLU (Command Line Utility) is backed by the best-tested crypto using wolfCrypt and it can make use of FIPS builds with wolfSSL!
wolfCLU currently has the following features:
– Support for ED25519 sign and verify
– Autoconf for portability
– Encrypt a file and store it locally on your computer
– Decrypt that file after it has been encrypted, or send it via email to your friend, if he/she knows the password and algorithm used for encryption, they can then decrypt it on their computer
– Hash a single file (IE a zip archive) for verification
– Benchmark the currently configured Algorithms
– X509 parsing and print out
Download wolfCLU: https://github.com/wolfssl/wolfclu
Love it? Star us on GitHub!
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Advantages of using wolfTPM with ST33 TPM 2.0
wolfTPM is the only TPM 2.0 library designed for baremetal and embedded systems. It also has native Windows and Linux support, alongside a TPM simulator for rapid development and testing.
When it comes to choosing a TPM 2.0 dedicated chip for your project, there are multiple options: Nuvoton NPCT75x, STMicroelectronics ST33, Infineon SLB9670, Microchip ATTPM20P, etc.
Here are our highlights when using ST33 chip with wolfTPM:
- Only wolfTPM supports GPIO control for ST33
- Depending on the chip variant, a ST33 could offer up to four(4) extra GPIO
- The access to these GPIO is protected by the TPM 2.0 authorization
- Making the GPIO control offered by wolfTPM a great tool for signaling across subsystems for critical, important or security events
- wolfTPM also provides an open-source example code ready for use
- ST33 has the most Non-volatile memory storage on the market, right now
- Typically, TPM 2.0 NVRAM storage is limited, this makes ST33 stand out. Multiple certificates and keys can be stored in the ST33 non-volatile memory
- wolfTPM offers open-source examples on how to securely store secrets and keys in the TPM’s NVRAM
- Using ST33 for Automotive, Industrial, Medical and Aerospace devices with wolfTPM is easy
- Critical-safety systems often use state machines and RTOS
- Baremetal and RTOS do not provide driver for TPM 2.0
- Thanks to wolfTPM’s design, using ST33 without a driver is possible
- wolfTPM has its own internal TIS layer and direct support for I2C and SPI
- Using ST33 for IoT devices with wolfTPM is highly recommended, because our TPM 2.0 stack is lightweight. In comparison with other libraries, wolfTPM produces 20 times less code and 100 times less memory.
- Only ST33 supports AES symmetric operations for encryption and decryption by default, using TPM2_EncryptDecrypt2. Other TPM 2.0 modules support by default only AES CFB for parameter encryption.
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Cryptographic benchmarks on the new Apple M1
wolfSSL is up and running and tested on Apple’s new M1 chip, and with the right options it is blazing fast! We have decided to benchmark our wolfCrypt/wolfSSL libraries on the Apple M1, to show you just how well the the M1 will perform in our standard cryptographic benchmarks.
See below for more details!
Algorithm | Stock | FPECC | Tuned | units |
---|---|---|---|---|
AES-128-CBC-enc | 293.883 | 290.948 | 1398.339 | MB/s |
AES-128-CBC-dec | 373.651 | 370.746 | 13249.163 | MB/s |
AES-192-CBC-enc | 254.407 | 252.17 | 1262.787 | MB/s |
AES-192-CBC-dec | 309.909 | 299.734 | 10647.85 | MB/s |
AES-256-CBC-enc | 222.387 | 217.493 | 1089.026 | MB/s |
AES-256-CBC-dec | 262.953 | 256.281 | 8721.781 | MB/s |
AES-128-GCM-enc | 179.345 | 174.943 | 1747.438 | MB/s |
AES-128-GCM-dec | 178.981 | 172.858 | 916.025 | MB/s |
AES-192-GCM-enc | 162.299 | 162.208 | 1741.425 | MB/s |
AES-192-GCM-dec | 162.174 | 159.531 | 918.173 | MB/s |
AES-256-GCM-enc | 149.777 | 145.503 | 1737.536 | MB/s |
AES-256-GCM-dec | 149.824 | 147.596 | 916.683 | MB/s |
GMAC Table 4-bit | 349.384 | 347.843 | 1133.42 | MB/s |
CHACHA | 634.519 | 627.355 | 1610.471 | MB/s |
POLY1305 | 2033.201 | 2041.016 | 3875.21 | MB/s |
CHA-POLY | 467.391 | 460.927 | 1159.885 | MB/s |
RNG | 94.615 | 92.271 | 824.593 | MB/s |
SHA1 | 698.103 | 721.239 | 740.663 | MB/s |
SHA2-224 | 203.827 | 205.559 | 2342.624 | MB/s |
SHA2-256 | 205.875 | 205.747 | 2345.45 | MB/s |
SHA2-384 | 490.398 | 493.513 | 469.233 | MB/s |
SHA2-512 | 498.631 | 495.535 | 472.364 | MB/s |
SHA3-224 | 575.71 | 570.766 | 535.922 | MB/s |
SHA3-256 | 543.394 | 540.197 | 517.069 | MB/s |
SHA3-384 | 410.624 | 412.87 | 400.126 | MB/s |
SHA3-512 | 279.388 | 285.977 | 282.751 | MB/s |
HMAC-MD5 | 498.966 | 508.38 | 511.853 | MB/s |
HMAC-SHA1 | 721.945 | 735.642 | 714.138 | MB/s |
HMAC-SHA2-224 | 205.603 | 205.892 | 2320.677 | MB/s |
HMAC-SHA2-256 | 205.961 | 205.791 | 2350.719 | MB/s |
HMAC-SHA2-384 | 498.012 | 494.334 | 465.534 | MB/s |
HMAC-SHA2-512 | 498.887 | 496.538 | 456.999 | MB/s |
RSA 2048 public | 19270.458 | 19386.083 | 61480.153 | ops/sec |
RSA 2048 private | 310.831 | 312.818 | 1855.512 | ops/sec |
DH 2048 agree | 1032.402 | 1019.901 | 3984.282 | ops/sec |
ECDHE P-256 agree | 1627.55 | 12351.73 | 22747.658 | ops/sec |
ECDSA P-256 sign | 1570.605 | 9734.156 | 40588.639 | ops/sec |
ECDSA P-256 verify | 2388.126 | 9321.698 | 22289.143 | ops/sec |
ECC P-256 key gen | 1613.476 | 11507.204 | 64141.471 | ops/sec |
DH 2048 key gen | 2042.726 | 2059.996 | 4098.742 | ops/sec |
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
wolfSSL support for NXP i.MX RT1060
The i.MX RT1060 is a powerful crossover MCU implementation of the Arm Cortex-M7 core, designed and produced by NXP. This MCU contains a TRNG and a data co-processor (DCP). The latter is capable of performing AES encryption and decryption, as well as calculating SHA and SHA256 digest.
Starting from version 4.7.0, wolfSSL provides a port driver that can redirect all the AES and SHA/SHA256 operations to the DCP, which has a number of advantages over the software implementation counterparts, reducing the footprint of the compiled library, improving performance and using less power.
The DCP driver can be enabled via the compile-time flag WOLFSSL_IMXRT_DCP, which delegates all the AES and SHA/SHA256 operations to the hardware co-processor. When this option is enabled, all TLS connections using these algorithms will rely on the hardware to perform the operations.
wolfSSL can also use the TRNG present in this core as an entropy source to seed the DRBG. Support for TRNG on this board can be enabled by adding the compile-time flag FREESCALE_KSDK_2_0_TRNG.
WolfSSL is not the only component in the product family that directly benefits from the presence of these secure elements on this target platform. SSH servers and clients based on wolfSSH will automatically use the accelerators for both SHA and AES when available and compiled in. The port for i.MX-RT1060 of wolfBoot, our secure bootloader, uses the SHA256 hardware acceleration to speed up the verification of the integrity of the firmware image. A full port of wolfBoot for i.MX-RT1060 is available, and its hardware abstraction layer is distributed with wolfBoot since version 1.7.1.
i.MX-RT1060 is a popular choice as edge computing platform, often deployed in combination with a real-time operating system and TCP/IP connectivity. WolfSSL, wolfSSH, wolfBoot and wolfMQTT can be easily added to these scenarios to enable secure communication, secure remote shell and filesystem services, as well as secure boot and remote firmware updates. The extra hardware security provided by DCP and TRNG makes the i.MX-RT1060 a reliable platform to build professional grade security with the latest standards.
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
strongSwan + wolfSSL + FIPS!
As some may be aware, wolfSSL added support for strongSwan in April of 2019. The upstream commit can be reviewed here: https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan/pull/133
Users can test the latest development master of wolfSSL with the latest version of strongSwan using the following setup:
wolfSSL Build and Installation Steps
$ git clone https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl.git $ cd wolfssl $ ./autogen.sh $ ./configure --enable-opensslall --enable-keygen --enable-rsapss --enable-des3 --enable-dtls --enable-certgen --enable-certreq --enable-certext --enable-sessioncerts --enable-crl --enable-ocsp CFLAGS="-DWOLFSSL_DES_ECB -DWOLFSSL_LOG_PRINTF -DWOLFSSL_PUBLIC_MP -DHAVE_EX_DATA" $ make $ make check $ sudo make install
strongSwan Build and Installation Steps
# if the following packages are not already installed: $ sudo apt-get install flex bison byacc libsoup2.4-dev gperf $ git clone https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan.git $ cd strongswan $ ./autogen.sh # if packages are missing autogen.sh must be re-run $ ./configure --disable-defaults --enable-pki --enable-wolfssl --enable-pem $ make $ make check $ sudo make install
wolfSSL has had interest in enabling FIPS 140-2/140-3 support with strongSwan so our engineers verified everything is working with the wolfCrypt FIPS 140-2 validated Module!
The steps wolfSSL used for testing are as follows:
Testing was done using the wolfSSL commercial FIPS release v4.7.0 which internally uses the wolfCrypt v4.0.0 FIPS 140-2 validated Crypto Module. It was located in the /home/user-name/Downloads
directory on the target test system, Linux 4.15 Ubuntu 18.04 LTS running on Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 v6 @ 3.80GHz.
- wolfSSL was configured and installed with these settings:
./configure --enable-opensslall --enable-keygen --enable-rsapss --enable-des3 --enable-dtls --enable-certgen --enable-certreq --enable-certext --enable-sessioncerts --enable-crl --enable-ocsp CFLAGS="-DWOLFSSL_DES_ECB -DWOLFSSL_LOG_PRINTF -DWOLFSSL_PUBLIC_MP -DHAVE_EX_DATA -DFP_MAX_BITS=8192" --enable-ed25519 --enable-curve25519 --enable-fips=v2 --enable-intelasm --prefix=$(pwd)/../fips-install-dir make make install
- A custom install location was used which equated to
/home/user-name/Downloads/fips-install-dir
and the configuration for strongSwan accounted for this. - strongSwan was cloned to
/home/user-name/Downloads
with “git clone https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan.git
” - StongSwan was configured and installed with these settings:
./configure --disable-defaults --enable-pki --enable-wolfssl --enable-pem --prefix=$(pwd)/../strongswan-install-dir wolfssl_CFLAGS="-I$(pwd)/../fips-install-dir/include" wolfssl_LIBS="-L$(pwd)/../fips-install-dir/lib -lwolfssl" make make install make check
- In the make check stage of the test, it was observed that 1 test was failing.
Passed 34 of 35 'libstrongswan' suites FAIL: libstrongswan_tests ================== 1 of 1 test failed ==================
- Reviewing the logs it was apparent one of the RSA tests was failing.
- Upon further debugging it turned out the failure was a test in strongSwan that was attempting to create an RSA key size of 1536-bits.
Running case 'generate': DEBUG: key_sizes[_i] set to 1024 + PASS DEBUG: key_sizes[_i] set to 1536 - FAIL DEBUG: key_sizes[_i] set to 2048 + PASS DEBUG: key_sizes[_i] set to 3072 + PASS DEBUG: key_sizes[_i] set to 4096 + PASS
wolfSSL has a function RsaSizeCheck()
which in FIPS mode will specifically reject any non FIPS RSA key sizes so this failure was not only expected, but it is a good thing for those wanting to use strongSwan in FIPS mode and ensure only FIPS-validated RSA key sizes will be supported!
wolfSSL is pleased that with the latest release of wolfSSL v4.7.0 and the wolfCrypt FIPS 140-2 module validated on FIPS certificate 3389, strongSwan support is working splendidly and wolfSSL engineers will be making efforts to ensure continued support into the future!
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
What are the Advantages of wolfTPM?
At wolfSSL, we have been developing a TPM stack with customers for many years called wolfTPM, a portable, open-source TPM 2.0 stack with backward API compatibility, designed for embedded use. It is highly portable, and has native support for Linux and Windows. RTOS and bare metal environments can take advantage of a single IO callback for SPI hardware interface, no external dependencies, and compact code size with low resource usage.
wolfTPM offers API wrappers to help with complex TPM operations like attestation and examples to help with complex cryptographic processes like the generation of Certificate Signing Request (CSR) using a TPM.
Due to wolfTPM’s portability, it is generally very easy to compile on new platforms.
Here are a few reasons to use wolfTPM over other secure elements:
1) It is based on a widely accepted standard TCG TPM 2.0.
2) There are many chip vendors options and they are pin compatible.
3) Support for RSA. All TPM’s support at least RSA 2048 (the STSAFE and ATECC do not).
4) More NV storage
5) Measured Boot (PCR’s)
6) Advanced Policy management
7) Seal/unseal data based on private key or PCR state.
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Love it? Star wolfSSL on GitHub.
wolfSSL’s Firsts
As a Cybersecurity company we have to make sure all of our products are state of the art. As such we make sure to be proactive, so that our products are always the best they can be. Being an open source company, we like to keep our users, customers, and followers up to date on our successes. As such, we have compiled an exhaustive list of all of wolfSSL`s current and upcoming firsts.
wolfSSL Current Firsts:
- First Open Source Dual Licensed TLS (GPLv2/Commercial)
- First TLS to adopt fuzz testing; now sporting 7 internal nightly fuzz testers and 2 external fuzz testers
- First TLS 1.2 implementation
- First DTLS 1.2 implementation
- First TLS to support quantum resistant encryption (PQC) …in 2010! We used NTRU.
- First TLS 1.3 implementation
- First MQTT SN implementation
- First MQTT 5.0 implementation
- First IETF SUIT Secure Boot implementation
- First TLS 1.3 Sniffer
- First DO 178 DAL A certified crypto library
- First TPM 2.0 stack designed for baremetal and embedded systems – wolfTPM
Upcoming firsts:
- First FIPS 140-3 software library certificate for general purpose use
- First DTLS 1.3 implementation
Users should consider the vibrancy of their TLS provider. If you want or need the best TLS, then you should look no farther than wolfSSL, the market leader. Who is winning? wolfSSL is, that’s who!
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Love it? Star wolfSSL on GitHub.
wolfCrypt as an Engine for OpenSSL
As many people know, the OpenSSL project is struggling with FIPS, as of October 2020, OpenSSL has no active FIPS 140 validation. OpenSSL had plans to restore it’s FIPS validation with OpenSSL 3.0, however they ran into significant delays, and since FIPS 140-2 testing ends September 2021, OpenSSL ultimately decided to focus their efforts on FIPS 140-3 standards.
This means that OpenSSL users will not have a supported package for the indefinite future. This is a big issue for companies that rely on security.
To fill this breach, wolfSSL has integrated our FIPS-certified crypto module (wolfCrypt) with OpenSSL as an OpenSSL engine. This means that:
- OpenSSL users can get a supported FIPS solution, with packages available up to the 24×7 level,
- The new wolfCrypt FIPS solution supports algorithms used in TLS 1.3, meaning your OpenSSL-based project can support TLS 1.3,
- You can support hardware encryption with your project, as the new wolfCrypt solution has full hardware encryption support, as provided by native wolfCrypt!
Additionally, should you be using one of the OpenSSL derivatives like BoringSSL, we can also support you.
wolfEngine is structured as a separate standalone library which links against wolfSSL (libwolfssl) and OpenSSL. wolfEngine implements and exposes an OpenSSL engine implementation which wraps the wolfCrypt native API internally. Algorithm support matches that as listed on the wolfCrypt FIPS 140-2 certificate #3389.
wolfEngine is compiled by default as a shared library called libwolfengine which can be dynamically registered at runtime by an application or OpenSSL through a config file. wolfEngine also provides an entry point for applications to load the engine when compiled in a static build.
The current wolfCrypt FIPS engine for OpenSSL has been tested on Linux with OpenSSL 1.0.2h and 1.1.1b inside OpenSSL apps (s_client, s_server, etc) and several popular Open Source packages – including cURL, stunnel, nginx, OpenLDAP, and OpenSSH!
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Love it? Star wolfSSL on GitHub.
Weekly updates
Archives
- February 2025 (5)
- January 2025 (23)
- December 2024 (22)
- November 2024 (29)
- October 2024 (18)
- September 2024 (21)
- August 2024 (24)
- July 2024 (27)
- June 2024 (22)
- May 2024 (28)
- April 2024 (29)
- March 2024 (21)
- February 2024 (18)
- January 2024 (21)
- December 2023 (20)
- November 2023 (20)
- October 2023 (23)
- September 2023 (17)
- August 2023 (25)
- July 2023 (39)
- June 2023 (13)
- May 2023 (11)
- April 2023 (6)
- March 2023 (23)
- February 2023 (7)
- January 2023 (7)
- December 2022 (15)
- November 2022 (11)
- October 2022 (8)
- September 2022 (7)
- August 2022 (12)
- July 2022 (7)
- June 2022 (14)
- May 2022 (10)
- April 2022 (11)
- March 2022 (12)
- February 2022 (22)
- January 2022 (12)
- December 2021 (13)
- November 2021 (27)
- October 2021 (11)
- September 2021 (14)
- August 2021 (10)
- July 2021 (16)
- June 2021 (13)
- May 2021 (9)
- April 2021 (13)
- March 2021 (24)
- February 2021 (22)
- January 2021 (18)
- December 2020 (19)
- November 2020 (11)
- October 2020 (3)
- September 2020 (20)
- August 2020 (11)
- July 2020 (7)
- June 2020 (14)
- May 2020 (13)
- April 2020 (14)
- March 2020 (4)
- February 2020 (21)
- January 2020 (18)
- December 2019 (7)
- November 2019 (16)
- October 2019 (14)
- September 2019 (18)
- August 2019 (16)
- July 2019 (8)
- June 2019 (9)
- May 2019 (28)
- April 2019 (27)
- March 2019 (15)
- February 2019 (10)
- January 2019 (16)
- December 2018 (24)
- November 2018 (9)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (15)
- August 2018 (5)
- July 2018 (15)
- June 2018 (29)
- May 2018 (12)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (18)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (11)
- December 2017 (5)
- November 2017 (12)
- October 2017 (5)
- September 2017 (7)
- August 2017 (6)
- July 2017 (11)
- June 2017 (7)
- May 2017 (9)
- April 2017 (5)
- March 2017 (6)
- January 2017 (8)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (15)
- September 2016 (6)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (9)
- May 2016 (4)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (4)
- February 2016 (9)
- January 2016 (6)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (6)
- October 2015 (5)
- September 2015 (5)
- August 2015 (8)
- July 2015 (7)
- June 2015 (9)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (12)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (6)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (11)
- August 2014 (5)
- July 2014 (9)
- June 2014 (10)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (9)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (5)
- December 2013 (7)
- November 2013 (4)
- October 2013 (7)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (9)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (4)
- May 2013 (7)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (3)
- January 2013 (8)
- December 2012 (12)
- November 2012 (5)
- October 2012 (7)
- September 2012 (3)
- August 2012 (6)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (3)
- May 2012 (4)
- April 2012 (6)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (5)
- January 2012 (7)
- December 2011 (5)
- November 2011 (7)
- October 2011 (5)
- September 2011 (6)
- August 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (7)
- May 2011 (11)
- April 2011 (4)
- March 2011 (12)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (11)
- December 2010 (17)
- November 2010 (12)
- October 2010 (11)
- September 2010 (9)
- August 2010 (20)
- July 2010 (12)
- June 2010 (7)
- May 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (1)