RECENT BLOG NEWS
Job Posting: wolfSSL C# Programmer
wolfSSL is looking to hire a C# programmer to work on our TLS interface and wolfCrypt interface for C#.
If interest wolfSSL product and company details can be found online at www.wolfssl.com.
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Fuzz Testing
All of the wolfSSL team prides themselves on offering the Best Tested SSL/TLS library on the market. wolfSSL is able to do so by conducting regular, diligent, and well-planned testing to maintain a robust and secure library. wolfSSL knows that it is impossible to test every single possible path through the software, but opts to practice an approach that is focused on lowering risk of failure. wolfSSL implements an extensive internal testing plan that not only uses automated testing but makes sure to test well-known use cases. A key process in wolfSSLs’ internal testing plan is Fuzz Testing.
What is Fuzz Testing?
Fuzz testing, also known as fuzzing, is an automated software testing technique that is conducted to reveal coding errors and security loopholes in softwares, networks, or operating systems. A fuzz test is a technique that is widely used to discover defects which otherwise would not be identified by merely using traditional functional testing methods. Fuzzing is a Black Box testing technique that bombards a library with invalid, unexpected, or random data (known as fuzz to the system) in an attempt to expose inputs that cause the system to crash, fail in unexpected ways, or leak memory. This allows wolfSSL to catch bugs that could turn into potential vulnerabilities before they are able to make it into a release!
Fuzzing at wolfSSL
wolfSSL firmly believes that if a TLS and cryptography provider does not do fuzz testing, they are extremely exposed. wolfSSL runs 7 fuzz testers internally, every night to insure the most secure library on the market. wolfSSL tests using several different software fuzzers, including an in-memory fuzzer, a network fuzzer, OSS-fuzz, libfuzzer, tlsfuzzer, and AFL.
As a testament to wolfSSLs’ commitment to security, highly respected external testers are utilized when possible, for example: Guido Vranken in Holland and Robert Horr of T-Systems in Germany (check out this post by Guido Vranken on Fuzzing for wolfSSL).
As stated in the wolfSSL 2019 Annual Report, wolfSSL is the best – tested cryptography on market, due to consistent implementation of additional fuzz testing resources from both internal and external sources.
For further details regarding the internal wolfSSL process of testing to ensure code quality and security, please reference this blog page.
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
If there is a desire for wolfSSL to include other SSL/TLS or crypto implementations in wolfSSL interop testing, please let the wolfSSL team know! Likewise, if users would like to include wolfSSL in their own test framework, wolfSSL would be happy to discuss!
First DO-178 SOI Audits
As a Cybersecurity company we have to make sure all of our products are state of the art. In accordance, wolfSSL is conducting Stages of Involvement (SOI) audit on our wolfCrypt product.
Last year wolfSSL added support for complete RTCA DO-178C level A certification. wolfSSL offers DO-178 wolfCrypt as a commercial off -the-shelf (COTS) solution for connected avionics applications. The primary goal of this was to provide the proper cryptographic underpinnings for secure boot and secure firmware update in commercial and military avionics. Avionics developers now have a flexible, compact, economical, high-performance COTS solution for quickly delivering FIPS 140-2 validated crypto algorithms can be used in DO-178 mode for combined FIPS 140-2/DO-178 consumption.
Any aviation system development requires Stages of Involvement (SOI) audits to review the overall software project and ensure that it complies with the objectives of DO-178. Originally, DO-178 based development did not require SOI’s, however a problem arose because of divergence between different development organizations and what the certification authorities wanted. As a result, SOI’s have become an informal de facto standard applied to most projects.
To assess compliance, there are four Stages of Involvement. The four stages are:
- Planning Review
- Design review
- Validation and Verification review
- Final Review
We have fully completed SOI #1 through #4.
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
wolfSSL libest Port
Are you interested in having the best tested cryptography ported to libest? wolfSSL has many ports to various devices and projects. We are constantly working on and expanding our collection of ports and will soon be working on porting wolfSSL/wolfCrypt into libest.
The libest project is a library that implements RFC 7030 (Enrollment over Secure Transport). EST is used to provision certificates from a CA or RA. EST is a replacement for SCEP, providing several security enhancements and support for ECC certificates. Libest is written in C and currently is set up to use OpenSSL 1.0.1. This port will allow libest to use wolfSSL in place of OpenSSL.
If you are interested in using wolfSSL with libest, or are looking to use wolfSSL with a different open source project, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Special Offer for NTLM + cURL Users
We hope everyone is enjoying this June weather. We understand due to current circumstances we have been under lockdown and cannot enjoy the weather as we have in the past. It is however a fantastic time to start a new project, or update and get proper support for your existing ones. That is why we are offering a 20% discount on support for NTLM + cURL users this June.
cURL is a computer software project providing a library for transferring data using various protocols. These protocols include (but are not limited to) FTP, FTPS, HTTP, HTTPS, and more. This version of the cURL library is nearly identical to the original library, except for a major difference: it is available for dual-licensing like many of the other wolfSSL products. Additionally, wolfSSL provides commercial curl support as well as support for wolfCrypt FIPS and FIPS ready.
NTLM authentication is a family of authentication protocols that are encompassed in the Windows Msv1_0.dll. The NTLM authentication protocols include LAN Manager version 1 and 2, and NTLM version 1 and 2. The NTLM authentication protocols authenticate users and computers based on a challenge/response mechanism that proves to a server or domain controller that a user knows the password associated with an account.
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
wolfSSL DTLS 1.2 Secure Renegotiation
wolfSSL has added support for secure renegotiation in DTLS 1.2 as defined in RFC 5746. Secure renegotiation is an extension to (D)TLS 1.2 which fixes the vulnerability found in the original specification. Previously, a third party could use renegotiation to inject malicious data preceding valid data from the client. This could be accomplished by establishing a (D)TLS connection with the target server and sending data over this connection. The third party can then intercept a handshake initiation attempt from the client and send this over its already established connection to trigger a renegotiation. The client’s connection is then established over the third party’s connection. From the perspective of the server the client sent data and then initiated a renegotiation. This is dangerous as the application layer could interpret this as a single valid stream of data causing the malicious traffic to be used in the context of the client’s valid traffic.
RFC 5746 (D)TLS Renegotiation Indication Extension creates a cryptographic binding between the renegotiation and the underlying (D)TLS to disallow a man in the middle attack on the secure connection. In a secure renegotiation, the client and server dismiss an invalid renegotiation attempt.
(D)TLS secure renegotiation may be used for example to establish new cryptographic parameters to increase security. It may also be used to request a certificate from the other party to require authentication before completing some action in the application layer.
To use secure renegotiation in wolfSSL use the “–enable-secure-renegotiation” configure option. For more build options refer to the second chapter of the wolfSSL User Manual.
The wolfSSL DTLS 1.2 secure renegotiation implementation is also compatible with our asynchronous module! Use hardware acceleration and don’t wait on pending cryptographic operations! If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Treck Vulnerabilities
Recently the Treck (https://treck.com/) TCP stack has had some notable vulnerabilities reported. Though this TCP stack is not a part of the wolfSSL software, it is an embedded TCP stack, and we would like to help with notifying the embedded community that if you are using the Treck TCP stack then it should be updated. Attacks from these reports can range anywhere from a denial of service to leaking information. Further reading about the report can be found at the CERT coordinating center site here: https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/257161.
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
New Edwards Curve Algorithms: X448 and Ed448
wolfSSL 4.4.0 introduces new high security elliptic curve algorithms: X448 and Ed448. These algorithms are specified for TLS – RFC 8446 and RFC 8442 – and in NIST drafts FIPS 186-5 and SP 800-186.
These high security algorithms are not only fast but also small – 10KB for the optimised X448 C code on Intel x64! And it’s faster than OpenSSL:
Algorithm | Operation | wolfSSL C | OpenSSL 1.1.1c |
---|---|---|---|
ECDH X448 | Key Gen | 6409 | |
ECDH X448 | Key Agree | 6449 | 2635 |
ECDSA ED448 | Sign | 14591 | 4339 |
ECDSA ED448 | Verify | 5290 | 2388 |
wolfSSL is nearly two and half times faster than OpenSSL when performing key agreement, three and a third times faster for signing and over two times faster when verifying!
Curve448 is great choice for applications where code size matters; especially compared to P-384:
Algorithm | Operation | wolfSSL C Curve448 | wolfSSL C P-384 | OpenSSL 1.1.1c P-384 |
---|---|---|---|---|
ECDH X448 | Key Gen | 6409 | 8505 | |
ECDH X448 | Key Agree | 6449 | 3121 | 1455 |
ECDSA ED448 | Sign | 14591 | 4339 | 1391 |
ECDSA ED448 | Verify | 5290 | 2388 | 1842 |
Curve448 can be used in TLS 1.2 and 1.3 for key exchange and certificates.
Do you need higher security or is code size important? Then you must consider using X448 and Ed448 for your public key operations from wolfSSL!
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
wolfSSL ARM mbed-os Port
With every release of the wolfSSL embedded SSL/TLS library, there are multiple feature additions, port additions, and updates. One of the ports that was added to the wolfSSL library recently was a port to ARM mbed-os! You can checkout the changes for mbed-os port in PR #12997 the ARMmbed/mbed-os github repository (https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbed-os/pull/12997) . While you’re there we would greatly appreciate it if you could “react” to the PR.
Arm Mbed OS is a free, open-source embedded operating system designed specifically for the “things” in the Internet of Things. Mbed OS provides the Mbed C/C++ software platform and tools for creating microcontroller firmware that runs on IoT devices. It consists of the core libraries that provide the microcontroller peripheral drivers, networking, RTOS and runtime environment, build tools and test and debug scripts. These connections can be secured by compatible SSL/TLS libraries such as wolfSSL, which supports mbed-rtos.
A very important note to make here is that we are the source of TLS 1.3 and FIPS Ready and a whole world of hardware encryption support for MBED OS! (not mbedTLS)
The list of reasons to use wolfSSL vs mbedTLS is very long, but here are a few:
- Reduced code size
- Commercial grade production TLS / Crypto library
- FIPS 140-2 certification
- Supported by original engineers (support@wolfssl.com)
- Designed for embedded use
- Performance is better and can be increased further (see ENABLE_WOLF_SPEEDUPS).
- Fastest vulnerability response time in the industry.
- TLS v1.3 (can be enabled in mbed-os/blob/wolf/features/wolf/user_settings.h using WOLFSSL_TLS13)
- Progressive algorithms (SHA3, Curve/ED448, Curve/ED25519, etc…)
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Fast P-384 in Single Precision (SP)
wolfSSL 4.4.0 introduces new optimised implementations of the elliptic curve P-384. Our Single Precision (SP) math code has been enhanced to support the NIST P-384/secp384r1 curve. If you need higher security public key cryptography then P-384 from wolfSSL is your choice.
wolfSSL now has optimised C implementations that will enhance the performance on any platform while there are assembly optimisations for Intel and ARM chips. As an example of the improvements you will see, take a look at the comparison to OpenSSL when signing and verifying on Intel x64:
Algorithm | Bits | Operation | wolfSSL SP | OpenSSL 1.1.1c |
---|---|---|---|---|
ECC | 384 | Sign | 19493 | 1391 |
ECC | 384 | Verify | 6025 (14384*) | 1842 |
*with pre-computation table caching
That’s right, a 14 times improvement in speed for signing and 3.2 times (or 7.8 when using caching) improvement in verification!
Also take look at the performance of the key agreement operation in comparison with high security DH (also optimised in SP.)
Algorithm | Bits | Operation | wolfSSL SP | OpenSSL 1.1.1c |
---|---|---|---|---|
ECC | 384 | Key Agree | 7477 | 1455 |
DH | 2048 | Key Agree | 5162 | |
DH | 3072 | Key Agree | 2128 |
The P-384 curve key agreement is even faster than 2048-bit DH! High security and high performance are now in reach with the new SP optimised code.
If you have any questions or run into any issues, contact us at facts@wolfssl.com, or call us at +1 425 245 8247.
Weekly updates
Archives
- January 2025 (7)
- December 2024 (22)
- November 2024 (29)
- October 2024 (18)
- September 2024 (21)
- August 2024 (24)
- July 2024 (27)
- June 2024 (22)
- May 2024 (28)
- April 2024 (29)
- March 2024 (21)
- February 2024 (18)
- January 2024 (21)
- December 2023 (20)
- November 2023 (20)
- October 2023 (23)
- September 2023 (17)
- August 2023 (25)
- July 2023 (39)
- June 2023 (13)
- May 2023 (11)
- April 2023 (6)
- March 2023 (23)
- February 2023 (7)
- January 2023 (7)
- December 2022 (15)
- November 2022 (11)
- October 2022 (8)
- September 2022 (7)
- August 2022 (12)
- July 2022 (7)
- June 2022 (14)
- May 2022 (10)
- April 2022 (11)
- March 2022 (12)
- February 2022 (22)
- January 2022 (12)
- December 2021 (13)
- November 2021 (27)
- October 2021 (11)
- September 2021 (14)
- August 2021 (10)
- July 2021 (16)
- June 2021 (13)
- May 2021 (9)
- April 2021 (13)
- March 2021 (24)
- February 2021 (22)
- January 2021 (18)
- December 2020 (19)
- November 2020 (11)
- October 2020 (3)
- September 2020 (20)
- August 2020 (11)
- July 2020 (7)
- June 2020 (14)
- May 2020 (13)
- April 2020 (14)
- March 2020 (4)
- February 2020 (21)
- January 2020 (18)
- December 2019 (7)
- November 2019 (16)
- October 2019 (14)
- September 2019 (18)
- August 2019 (16)
- July 2019 (8)
- June 2019 (9)
- May 2019 (28)
- April 2019 (27)
- March 2019 (15)
- February 2019 (10)
- January 2019 (16)
- December 2018 (24)
- November 2018 (9)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (15)
- August 2018 (5)
- July 2018 (15)
- June 2018 (29)
- May 2018 (12)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (18)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (11)
- December 2017 (5)
- November 2017 (12)
- October 2017 (5)
- September 2017 (7)
- August 2017 (6)
- July 2017 (11)
- June 2017 (7)
- May 2017 (9)
- April 2017 (5)
- March 2017 (6)
- January 2017 (8)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (15)
- September 2016 (6)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (9)
- May 2016 (4)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (4)
- February 2016 (9)
- January 2016 (6)
- December 2015 (4)
- November 2015 (6)
- October 2015 (5)
- September 2015 (5)
- August 2015 (8)
- July 2015 (7)
- June 2015 (9)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (12)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (6)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (11)
- August 2014 (5)
- July 2014 (9)
- June 2014 (10)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (9)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (5)
- December 2013 (7)
- November 2013 (4)
- October 2013 (7)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (9)
- July 2013 (7)
- June 2013 (4)
- May 2013 (7)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (3)
- January 2013 (8)
- December 2012 (12)
- November 2012 (5)
- October 2012 (7)
- September 2012 (3)
- August 2012 (6)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (3)
- May 2012 (4)
- April 2012 (6)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (5)
- January 2012 (7)
- December 2011 (5)
- November 2011 (7)
- October 2011 (5)
- September 2011 (6)
- August 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (7)
- May 2011 (11)
- April 2011 (4)
- March 2011 (12)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (11)
- December 2010 (17)
- November 2010 (12)
- October 2010 (11)
- September 2010 (9)
- August 2010 (20)
- July 2010 (12)
- June 2010 (7)
- May 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (1)