Topic: Compression method 221 vs 1
Hi all,
I had a look at the source code of wolfSSL and I've found out that the compression method used by wolfSSL has number 221. Why 221 instead of 1?
Cheers,
Giancarlo
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Please post questions or comments you have about wolfSSL products here. It is helpful to be as descriptive as possible when asking your questions.
ReferenceswolfSSL - Embedded SSL Library → wolfSSL → Compression method 221 vs 1
Hi all,
I had a look at the source code of wolfSSL and I've found out that the compression method used by wolfSSL has number 221. Why 221 instead of 1?
Cheers,
Giancarlo
Hi Giancarlo,
WolfSSL embedded SSL only compresses at the application data level. We implemented support for compression before a standard was finalized. As such, we chose a non-standard number for ZLIB_COMPRESSION. The specific number of 221 just being personal preference of the programmer.
Best Regards,
Chris
wolfSSL - Embedded SSL Library → wolfSSL → Compression method 221 vs 1
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Generated in 0.016 seconds (89% PHP - 11% DB) with 12 queries