Hi Simon,
It looks like you have a support contract on file with us, please contact us at support [AT] wolfssl [DOT] com so we can prioritize your support.
Thanks,
Kareem
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Please post questions or comments you have about wolfSSL products here. It is helpful to be as descriptive as possible when asking your questions.
ReferenceswolfSSL - Embedded SSL Library → Posts by kareem_wolfssl
Hi Simon,
It looks like you have a support contract on file with us, please contact us at support [AT] wolfssl [DOT] com so we can prioritize your support.
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi Simon,
To remove support for our AES CCM cipher suites, build wolfSSL with HAVE_AESCCM not defined. If you are using configure, you can use the argument --disable-aesccm to disable this.
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi just_david,
Glad you were able to solve your RSA issue.
-125 is MEMORY_E, which means we were unable to allocate enough memory. As you are on an embedded system, I would recommend enabling our small stack support and our small SP code, which you can do with: --enable-smallstack --enable-sp=small,nomalloc. Please let me know if you continue to run into errors with these flags.
Hi Samuel,
It looks like you are not enabling our OpenSSL compatibility layer when building curl, this implements EVP_MD_CTX and many other OpenSSL types/functions. Please share your build settings for wolfSSL and wolfSSL version. You should be building wolfSSL with --enable-curl to use it with curl.
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi David,
Our Microchip Harmony license was written by Microchip, please reach out to Microchip as they will be able to assist with your license questions.
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi Prabhu,
Our Microchip Harmony library is not licensed under GPL, it has a custom license which you can review here: https://github.com/Microchip-MPLAB-Harm … crochip.md
Please let me know if you have any further questions on this.
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi ler762,
It looks like you're cross-compiling and copying the test binary over to your target. Please ensure you are also copying the certs/ directory to your target, and that you are running the test binary from the same directory as certs/.
You will also need to modify wolfcrypt/test/test_paths.h with the path to your certs directory on your target.
Thanks,
Kareem
Copying from zendesk ticket:
When including wolfSSL headers in your application, you must include our build settings (options.h/settings.h) first as follows:
#include <wolfssl/options.h>
#include <wolfssl/wolfcrypt/settings.h>
You need to include these headers before all other wolf/OpenSSL headers in all files which include these headers. Please give it a try and let me know if it helps.
I am not seeing any attachments, please retry attaching your debug logs or contact us at support [AT] wolfssl [DOT] com for further assistance.
Please rebuild wolfSSL with --enable-debug defined and post debug logs of the server to help confirm what is going wrong. Please also include your full wolfSSL build settings, ./configure line or user_settings.h.
Is your embedded client running wolfSSL, or something else?
Hi Saurabh,
Make sure you are running our example server from your base wolfSSL directory, and not from inside of examples/server. Your base wolfSSL directory has certs/, examples/ etc. inside of it.
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi Resarf,
We haven't tried wolfTPM on a Raspberry Pi Pico, but we would expect it to work based on the platform's specs and wolfTPM's requirements.
Which TPM are you planning to use? Will you be attaching a physical TPM to your Pi?
You will need to build wolfTPM with the appropriate configure option for your TPM, you can find a full description of our configure options here: https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolftpm#buil … nd-defines
Thanks,
Kareem
Hello Anika,
The error you are seeing comes from our configure system failing to generate the header, this can happen if there's an issue with your toolchain or compiler flags. You should see a config.log file in your base wolfssl directory, do you see any errors in it? Please attach your config.log here.
I would also recommend upgrading to our recent release, 5.6.4, for the latest bugfixes and performance improvements: https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/rele … 6.4-stable
Thanks,
Kareem
Hello Mike,
Yes, your understanding of PSK is correct. I would recommend using PSK with ECDHE for this reason, if feasible. TLS 1.3 does generally offer forward secrecy, but there are cases where you would want to use PSK only, so it is still offered despite not offering forward secrecy.
You can turn on debug logging in wolfSSL to confirm the key exchange and connection are being completed as expected by building wolfSSL with --enable-debug. You could also capture a packet dump and open it with Wireshark to confirm everything being sent and received matches your expectations.
You may find our PSK examples and documentation here helpful: https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl-exam … master/psk
Thanks,
Kareem
Hello gsojc234,
wolfSSL is maintaining a rolling hash, which is updated after each message. Even though you will only see the hash using the current message's data when we are constructing the Finished message, it is using the hash computed from previous messages.
In some cases, we keep handshake data until after Finished is sent to compute this hash.
For more information on how we are doing this, check out the functions HashInput, HashOutput and HashRaw in internal.c.
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi OptiZle,
The examples include a user_settings.h which is tuned for the ESP32, I would recommend retrying with this. Our generic user_settings_default.h file is meant as a reference, and is not suitable out of the box for the ESP32.
Yes, we've recently improved our ESP32 support and added support for the S3. I don't believe this support was present in 5.5.4. I would strongly recommend upgrading.
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi OptiZle,
Thanks for reaching out to us.
-199 is RNG_FAILURE_E, which means we had an issue initializing your RNG.
What version of wolfSSL are you using, and what settings are you using to build wolfSSL? Have you tried using our Espressif example found here: https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/tree … if/ESP-IDF ? If not, I would recommend using it. Make sure you're using our latest version, 5.6.3.
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi lazH,
Your code is currently passing in the entire certificate DER to wc_RsaPublicKeyDecode, this won't work as wc_RsaPublicKeyDecode expects just the key.
You will need to call wolfSSL_X509_load_certificate_file followed by wolfSSL_X509_get_pubkey on your certificate to extract the public key. You can then call wc_RsaPublicKeyDecode on this extracted public key and use it as desired for encryption/decryption.
Check out our full example of this here: https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl-exam … m-certfile
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi pbreed,
We do not directly support generating a JSON web key, but we do support generating keys, exporting their components and encoding them as base64. After following these steps, you will need to handle creating the JSON and adding the base64-encoded components to this JSON.
For RSA:
1) Generate an RSA key using wc_MakeRsaKey: https://www.wolfssl.com/documentation/m … makersakey
2) Export the RSA key using wc_RsaFlattenPublicKey (n/e only for public key) or wc_RsaExportKey (all components for public + private key): https://www.wolfssl.com/documentation/m … npublickey
For ECC:
1) Generate an ECC key using wc_ecc_make_key: https://www.wolfssl.com/documentation/m … c_make_key
2) Export the ECC key using wc_ecc_export_public_raw/wc_ecc_export_private_raw.
Now base64 encode each component using Base64_Encode_NoNl: https://www.wolfssl.com/documentation/m … ncode_nonl
Then you will need to create the appropriate JSON and add these components.
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi ajmal,
You can use our user_settings.h to disable all features which are not needed for your use case. You can find a documented example of our common settings here: https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/blob … template.h
For us to give personalized size optimization support, we would need a paid support agreement in place. If you are interested, please let me know where you are located, and I will connect you with your region's sales rep.
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi b.stefano,
It looks like Microchip Harmony is currently providing wolfSSL 5.4.0 and wolfMQTT 1.11.1. While these versions are outdated, I would expect them to work. Are these the versions you are seeing in your Microchip Harmony project?
What build errors are you seeing from wolfSSL/wolfMQTT?
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi m_u_h,
To force a failed FIPS POST state, build wolfSSL with HAVE_FORCE_FIPS_FAILURE defined, then at runtime, call wolfCrypt_SetStatus_fips(DRBG_CONT_FIPS_E).
Thanks,
Kareem
Hello Fernando,
Check out our MQTT client example here for a general example of how to handle reads: https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfMQTT/tre … mqttclient
We also have other examples in examples/ which you may find helpful: https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfMQTT/tre … r/examples
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi singhshikha,
We do rely on some system calls such as closesocket, htons etc. Please confirm you are linking in your standard library. If so, you will need to provide wolfSSL with your OS' equivalent to these functions. We check if our function aliases such as CloseSocket have been defined, which allows you to override them by defining them in your user_settings.h:
#define CloseSocket(s) YourCloseSocketFn(s)
#define XHTONS(a) YourHtoNsFn((a))
#define XINET_PTON(a,b,c) YourInet_PtonFn((a),(b),(c))
#define DTLS_RECVFROM_FUNCTION YourRecvFromFn
#define DTLS_SENDTO_FUNCTION YourSendToFn
If you don't have any of these functions, you'll need to define a wrapper function instead which provides equivalent functionality.
setsockopt, getpeername and getsockopt are currently called directly in our code and can't be overridden.
WSAGetLastError is coming from USE_WINDOWS_API, don't define this if you don't have Windows API support.
If you continue to run into issues, please reach out to us at support AT wolfssl DOT com with your user_settings.h. It would also be helpful to know what kind of system calls your OS has available.
I recommend upgrading to our latest release 5.6.0 when feasible for the best support and performance.
Thanks,
Kareem
Hi akimoorthy,
Yes, you will definitely need ECC to achieve this size. You will want to use 256-bit ECC to generate a public key less than 72 bytes in size. Note that while the key itself will be smaller than 72 bytes, you are using a PFX file (PKCS#12) which will add some overhead. For minimal size, consider using a DER file, which will only contain the key itself.
Here is a full example of how to generate an ECC keypair and export it to .der files: https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl-exam … y-export.c
wolfSSL - Embedded SSL Library → Posts by kareem_wolfssl
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Generated in 0.017 seconds (86% PHP - 14% DB) with 4 queries